The moderator of Thursday's vice-presidential debate

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aptyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Raginl3ull
    You got me, I posted the wrong link....here is the correct one fucking moron Pwhahahha...and its not on ABC or FOX its on CBS shot 5 days ago. She reinforces her position on how the proximity is relevent Pwhahhahaha:



    LOL Clintons record again is irrelevent when trying to prove whether McCain has been loyal to his party or not. You said he is a proven reformer "maverick" when the record shows otherwise. EPIC FAIL Pwhaahhaha
    10% independent is more than most of the democrats.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Oh that's right, building pipe line through Canada, and fishing trade mission with Russia. Again 2 weeks after it was brought up on FOX.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    Interview was shot 2 weeks after she was nominated and FOX said that she was qualified because she was close to Russia.

    Epic fail, I edited your statement to show you where I was pointing out you being a moron.

    McCains record under Clinton is relevant, as McCain was a senator through that presidency and voted too in a republican congress. You know, the time when Clinton and Republican Congress got a lot of stuff done and undone.

    You got me, I posted the wrong link....here is the correct one fucking moron Pwhahahha...and its not on ABC or FOX its on CBS shot 5 days ago. She reinforces her position on how the proximity is relevent Pwhahhahaha:



    LOL Clintons record again is irrelevent when trying to prove whether McCain has been loyal to his party or not. You said he is a proven reformer "maverick" when the record shows otherwise. EPIC FAIL Pwhaahhaha

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Interview with ABC was shot 2 weeks after she was nominated and FOX said that she was qualified because she was close to Russia the day she was nominated.

    Epic fail, I edited your statement to show you where I was pointing out you being a moron.

    McCains record under Clinton is relevant, as McCain was a senator through that presidency and voted too in a republican congress. You know, the time when Clinton and Republican Congress got a lot of stuff done and undone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    what an ugly bitch, there could never be porn with that face

    I would rather put my faith in this ugly bitch knowing she could lead this country. Shows where your priorities are

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    She wasn't the one mention it, it was FOX pundits. Get your facts straight.

    She wasnt the one? Pwhahhahahahah....from the horses mouth:






    Oh boy, I love shooting you down

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    Pull same information for McCain voting with Clinton.

    Senate very often has majority vote, and that is not vote with president, that is vote with his constituents. There's no republican in senate with lower numbers.

    Same with democrats. But 1/20 and with party and then absentee and present votes, shows that Obama is indecisive and doesn't have a backbone to stand up for what he believes. Obama spent most of his time in senate not making a decision, thereby not changing a damn thing, which is what he was elected for into senate in a first place.
    Your using inferior strawman arguments to support your position. Clintons records is irrelevent. Also, I shot down your notion of "WITHOUT ALLEGIANCE to their parties" Case closed!

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Raginl3ull

    what an ugly bitch, there could never be porn with that face

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Raginl3ull
    Pwhahha..you forgot to mention how she emphasized how the proximity of Alaska to Russia was her selling points for her foreign policy qualifications.

    She wasn't the one mention it, it was FOX pundits. Get your facts straight.
    Last edited by Aptyp; 10-02-2008, 10:07 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • george graves
    replied
    God bless the interwebs! A Sarah Palin porn is in the works!!!

    Larry Flynt is using the power of porn to express his views on Sarah Palin.

    The Hustler founder and freedom of speech advocate has produced an X-rated movie using an adult-film actress who resembles the Republican vice presidential candidate.

    Flynt's producers posted an anonymous help-wanted ad on Craigslist in L.A. just days after the Republican convention. "Looking for a Sarah Palin look-alike," read the ad, "for an adult film to be shot in the next 10 days." The actress would be paid $3,000 for the part, said the ad.

    Flynt's spokesman David Carrillo confirmed to us yesterday that the film has been shot by Hustler Video, but he wouldn't yet reveal the title. They need only consult bloggers from humorist Mo Rocca to Choire Sicha at Radar, who upon discovery of the ad came up with such gems as "Juneau You Want It" and "Northern Xxxposure."

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Originally posted by Raginl3ull
    Year
    McCain Presidential Support Score

    2001
    91

    2002
    90

    2003
    91

    2004
    92

    2005
    77

    2006
    89

    2007
    95


    Pull same information for McCain voting with Clinton.

    Senate very often has majority vote, and that is not vote with president, that is vote with his constituents. There's no republican in senate with lower numbers.

    Same with democrats. But 1/20 and with party and then absentee and present votes, shows that Obama is indecisive and doesn't have a backbone to stand up for what he believes. Obama spent most of his time in senate not making a decision, thereby not changing a damn thing, which is what he was elected for into senate in a first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    Biden is qualified, and I voted for him in primaries, I am a registered democrat. I wanted to see a Clinton/Biden campaign since those two work very well together.

    I never expected that republicans would allow McCain to to be their nominee. After that, I thought McCain would select a similar republican to himself, but there wasn't one around. He couldn't select Ron Paul, he couldn't select Joe Biden. What do you expect? Palin made a perfect VP because she's a republican governor with good reputation and record. She's conservative, she's a woman, she's religious, she's guaranteed votes.

    You forgot to mention the 15 min phone call he had with her which was practically the only communication he has had with this women. This only reflects on how bad of a judgement this man has. If he wanted a woman who is qualified, knowledgable in energy, reform and foreign policy..this is who he should have picked!



    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    http://obama.senate.gov/votes/

    You are an idiot, I actually have proof.

    I never said Biden denied it, just like Palin never denied that she changed her mind after funding was pulled out and Alaskan citizens had to pay for it first, and receive federal support later. It's all over Alaskan news, and she was well justified doing so by her state's citizens.

    She has held an executive position with 80% approval. That's how she qualifies.

    Pwhahha..you forgot to mention how she emphasized how the proximity of Alaska to Russia was her selling points for her foreign policy qualifications. What about how she couldn't name a single Supreme Court ruling other than Roe V Wade? The list goes on....you as a citizen should be very scared realizing that she is a heartbeat from being the commander in cheif.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aptyp
    replied
    Biden is qualified, and I voted for him in primaries, I am a registered democrat. I wanted to see a Clinton/Biden campaign since those two work very well together.

    I never expected that republicans would allow McCain to to be their nominee. After that, I thought McCain would select a similar republican to himself, but there wasn't one around. He couldn't select Ron Paul, he couldn't select Joe Biden. What do you expect? Palin made a perfect VP because she's a republican governor with good reputation and record. She's conservative, she's a woman, she's religious, she's guaranteed votes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raginl3ull
    replied
    Originally posted by Aptyp
    i want proof on McCains 95% voting with Bush, you just pulled that out of your ass.



    SEN. ROBERT CASEY JR. of PENNSYLVANIA: "John McCain calls himself a maverick, but he votes with George Bush 90 percent of the time. That's not a maverick. That's a sidekick."

    _RENDELL: "And guess who voted with President Bush 90 percent of the time? Sen. John McCain."

    THE FACTS: McCain voted with President Bush 90 percent of the time from January 20, 2001, to when Congress left Washington on its annual August recess, according to a study by Congressional Quarterly. But McCain wasn't always a staunch Bush backer. In 2005, his support for Bush's position on legislation reached a low of 77 percent; last year, when he launched his latest bid for the GOP presidential nomination, he voted with Bush 95 percent of the time.


    Your such a fucking idiot! This only one cite....want more?




    More:





    According to Congressional Quarterly, McCain's presidential support scores (the percentage of roll call votes on which he sided with Bush's position) for each completed individual year of Bush's presidency are:

    Year
    McCain Presidential Support Score

    2001
    91

    2002
    90

    2003
    91

    2004
    92

    2005
    77

    2006
    89

    2007
    95

    Last edited by Raginl3ull; 10-02-2008, 09:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...