Isreal bomb Gaza, killing 195

[joshh]

You do realize you are an anti-semite, though.. right?

Of course I am with my "Palestine and Israel have equal rights to that land" comments.

Again, STFU.

[yoni]

Please provide link or post # to said comments.

[blunttech]

joshh is the heeter of palenstine only without good statistics

[joshh]

Please provide link or post # to said comments.

598...try to follow along would you.

joshh is the heeter of palenstine only without good statistics

Ahhhhhhhhhh, Blunt is being ignorant again, remember you're Blunt not ignorant.

[Money$hit]

Who gives a fuck.


Name one point in history where the world has been completely at peace.

[joshh]

Who gives a fuck.


Name one point in history where the world has been completely at peace.

It was before humans I'm sure.

[Money$hit]

It was before humans I'm sure.

During humanity.

[e30drop]

Protest in Washington DC Saturday January 10th!! Everyone go!

[yoni]

Of course I am with my "Palestine and Israel have equal rights to that land" comments.

Again, STFU.

598...try to follow along would you.





Ahhhhhhhhhh, Blunt is being ignorant again, remember you're Blunt not ignorant.

Your rhetoric and IGNORANCE bewilder me.

I've been following, moron.

None of your comments have even remotely insisted that "Palestine and Israel have equal rights to that land"

You have time and time again demonstrated your anti-semitism.

You have it wrong which the exact problem with israelis that are Zionists. The Palestinian people want at least their land back from 1967. It's Hamas and several other organizations that want to wipe Israel off the face of the planet. Get your facts right Zionist.

Are you sure you aren't Hamas..?

[parkerbink]

joshh is the heeter of palenstine only without good statistics

qft.

And that is covered in the Geneva Convention how! Rhetorical....

What does the Geneva Convention have to do with land taken in war?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions

The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties formulated in Geneva, Switzerland, that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns.
They chiefly concern the treatment of non-combatants and prisoners of war. They do not affect the use of weapons in war, which are covered by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Geneva Protocol on the use of gas and biological weapons of 1925 (The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is also referred to as "the Geneva Convention", but it is not part of these four).
The Conventions were the results of efforts by Henry Dunant, who was motivated by the horrors of war he witnessed at the Battle of Solferino in 1859. In 1977 and 2005 three separate amendments were made part of the Geneva Conventions.
The adoption of the First Convention followed the foundation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863. The text is given the title Resolutions of the Geneva International Conference, Geneva, 26–29 October 1863.
As of 2 August 2006,[1] when the Republic of Montenegro adopted the four conventions, they have been ratified by 194 countries.


And again all land not included in the 1947 border was won in wars in which Israel was attacked. How many times must that be stated?

[joshh]

This is how the Un divided it up.

[parkerbink]

This is how the Un divided it up.

Yes that is true. However the enemies of Israel said that was unacceptable and attacked over and over, each time losing land.

You understand, if you gamble and lose there are no do overs?


Sort of like you may have been perceived as a normal person prior to this thread, now not so much.

Interesting how you ignore my response showing the Geneva Convention has nothing to do with land disputes and you move on to another attempt at rationalizing the land dispute.

[Chisum]

Militant Islam Threatens Us All
Hamas rockets have the same terror goal as Hitler's blitz.Article

By BENJAMIN NETANYAHU
Imagine a siren that gives you 30 seconds to find shelter before a Kassam rocket falls from the sky and explodes, spraying its lethal shrapnel in all directions. Now imagine this happens day after day, month after month, year after year.

If you can imagine that, you can begin to understand the terror to which hundreds of thousands of Israelis have been subjected. Three years ago Israel withdrew from every square inch of Gaza. And since that withdrawal, our civilians have been targeted by more than 6,000 rockets and mortars fired from Gaza. In the face of this relentless bombardment, Israel has acted with a restraint that other countries, faced with a similar threat, would find hard to fathom. Israel's government has finally decided to respond.

For this action to succeed, we must first have moral clarity. There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy which seeks peace and targets the terrorists, and Hamas, an Iranian-backed terror organization that seeks Israel's destruction and targets the innocent.

In launching precision strikes against Hamas rocket launchers, headquarters, weapons depots, smuggling tunnels and training camps, Israel is trying to minimize civilian casualties. But Hamas deliberately attacks Israeli civilians and deliberately hides behind Palestinian civilians -- a double war crime. Responsible governments do their utmost to minimize civilian casualties, but they do not grant immunity to terrorists who use civilians as human shields.

The international community may occasionally condemn Hamas for putting Palestinian civilians in harm's way, but if it ultimately holds Israel responsible for the casualties that ensue, then Hamas and other terror organizations will employ this abominable tactic again and again.

The charge that Israel is using disproportionate force is equally baseless. Does proportionality demand that Israel fire 6,000 rockets indiscriminately back at Gaza? Does it demand an equal number of casualties on both sides? Using that logic, one would conclude that the United States employed disproportionate force against the Germans because 20 times as many Germans as Americans died in World War II.

In that same war, Britain responded to the firing of thousands of rockets on its population with the wholesale bombing of German cities. Israel's measured response to rocket fire on its cities has come in the form of surgical strikes. To further root out Hamas terrorists in a way that minimizes Palestinian civilian casualties, Israel's army is now engaged in a ground operation that places its soldiers in great peril. Carpet-bombing of Palestinian cities is not an option that any Israeli leader will entertain.

The goal of this mission should be clear: To end the current round of missile attacks and to remove the threat of such attacks in the future. The only cease-fire or diplomatic initiative that should be accepted is one that achieves this dual objective.

If our enemies assumed that the Israeli public would be divided on the eve of an election, they were wrong. When it comes to exercising our most basic right of self-defense, there is no opposition and no coalition. We stand united against Hamas because we know that only by defeating Hamas can we provide security for our people and hope for a future peace.

We fight to defend ourselves, but in so doing we are also fighting a fanatical ideology that seeks to reverse the course of history and throw the civilized world back into a new dark age. The struggle between militant Islam and modernity -- whether fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, India or Gaza -- will decide our common future. It is a battle we cannot afford to lose.

[joshh]

qft.



What does the Geneva Convention have to do with land taken in war?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions

The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties formulated in Geneva, Switzerland, that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns.
They chiefly concern the treatment of non-combatants and prisoners of war. They do not affect the use of weapons in war, which are covered by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Geneva Protocol on the use of gas and biological weapons of 1925 (The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is also referred to as "the Geneva Convention", but it is not part of these four).
The Conventions were the results of efforts by Henry Dunant, who was motivated by the horrors of war he witnessed at the Battle of Solferino in 1859. In 1977 and 2005 three separate amendments were made part of the Geneva Conventions.
The adoption of the First Convention followed the foundation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 1863. The text is given the title Resolutions of the Geneva International Conference, Geneva, 26–29 October 1863.
As of 2 August 2006,[1] when the Republic of Montenegro adopted the four conventions, they have been ratified by 194 countries.


And again all land not included in the 1947 border was won in wars in which Israel was attacked. How many times must that be stated?

I think you need to read it....LMFAO. So as long as the invading force takes the land for themselves it doesn't violate the Geneva Convensin....how do you explain what israel is doing in Palistine and the settlements they have set up on palestinian land?

[joshh]

Yes that is true. However the enemies of Israel said that was unacceptable and attacked over and over, each time losing land.

You understand, if you gamble and lose there are no do overs?


Sort of like you may have been percieved as a normal person prior to this thread, now not so much.

What happened to "Israel just wants peace"? Hey, let's take it out on the Palestinians. And that's the problem. Israel doesn't want peace. Which does violate the Geneva convension.