Presidential debate...

[Kershaw]

Racist? Really? I usually try and avoid these conflicts on forums but I felt it necessary to chime in.

i disagree with the US courts a bunch. that doesnt change anything. im 99% sure that everyone that that frequents the P&R forum can find things they disagree about with the US courts.

1. calling a fully grown man boy is disrespectful to start with. he's a man, not a boy.
2. calling a black man boy is racist. there is no way around it. the term started with slavery. most of my black friends agree it's almost as bad as calling someone ******.

vedubin is purposefully using it because he knows it's denigrating and disrespectful. it's offensive. just like mrsleeve calls romney mittens all the time. that's also disrespectful, but that's not racist. if you want to test this out, walk into camden, nj and call out to the first black man you see, "hey boy, where's the the closest gas station." go ahead and see what happens.

[mrsleeve]

^

Clearly you have not familiarized your self with the shit that Frank and Dodd did with the Fannie and freddie

[BraveUlysses]

Clearly you don't have a firm grasp of the situation when you draw these kind of conclusions:

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

THE FUCKING BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR !!!!!

[mrsleeve]

^

You assume I haven't......... I know it goes much furether than the little brife explanation of the recent events leading up to the down turn. Much of and be laid at the feet of the peanut farmer, I am fully aware its not just a blue thing, its a total govt thing,

[mrsleeve]

^

You assume I haven't......... I know it goes much furether than the little brife explanation of the recent events leading up to the down turn. Much of and be laid at the feet of the peanut farmer, I am fully aware its not just a blue thing, its a total govt thing,

[BraveUlysses]

Please correct him and post what really happened!

I can't make him read anything, clearly he doesn't give a shit about understanding the entire subject--he only learned enough to use it as a bludgeon to attack someone completely unrelated to the subject.

There's plenty of reading you can do in 30 minutes from any number of sources which would provide a more comprehensive account of what caused the current global fiscal nightmare, if he cared to try to educate himself.

[herbivor]

Apparently, I'm supposed to be more pissed about what Mitten is doing with his money than what The 0 is doing with mine.

Nice try there herbie:

January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress for the 1st time in a dozen years.

At the time, The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77, The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%, The Unemployment rate was 4.6%, George Bush ' s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH!!!!!!!!

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

THE FUCKING BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR !!!!!

Yup all Bush and the Republicans huh :crazy:

I found this interesting:

Historical data from up to 70 years

Debt and Deficit. In the past 17 Presidential terms, nine were GOP led and eight Democratic. Of nine GOP Presidents, six added to debt/GDP and deficit/GDP as a percent. The only three that did not, had a Democratic House and Senate. Of eight Democrats, each one, reduced deficit/GDP and debt/GDP as a percent. That is 66 years of rhetoric of fiscal responsibility with zero net results for GOP. What makes matters even worse, is the fact that the president who added a historical 20.7% to the debt has one unique aspect of his presidency – President G. W. Bush had a GOP majority House and Senate.
Spending. The Republican Party often talks about financial responsibility, but did you know that since 1978-2011, spending has gone up 9.9% under Democrats versus 12.1% under GOP.
Federal Debt. Republicans love to tell us how they will not close tax loopholes on millionaires and billionaires, yet never bring to our attention that from 1978-2011 debt went up 4.2% under Democrats versus 36.4% under the GOP.
GDP. The only thing that the Democrats have a higher numerical yield than the GOP led administrations, is the GDP. It’s a good thing to have it at 12.6% versus a GOP 10.7%. From 1960 to 2005 the gross domestic product measured in year-2000 dollars rose an average of $165 billion a year under Republican presidents and $212 billion a year under Democrats.
Big Government. Federal spending (aka “big government”): It has gone up an average of about $50 billion a year under presidents of both parties. But that breaks down as $35 billion a year under Democratic presidents and $60 billion under Republicans. If you assume that it takes a year for a president’s policies to take effect, Democrats have raised spending by $40 billion a year and Republicans by $55 billion.
Federal Deficit. Under Republican presidents since 1960, the federal deficit has averaged $131 billion a year. Under Democrats, that figure is $30 billion. In an average Republican year, the deficit has grown by $36 billion. In the average Democratic year it has shrunk by $25 billion.
National Debt. The national debt has gone up more than $200 billion a year under Republican presidents and less than $100 billion a year under Democrats.
Inflation and Unemployment. Democratic presidents have a better record on inflation (averaging 3.13 percent compared with 3.89 percent for Republicans) and on unemployment (5.33 percent versus 6.38 percent). Unemployment went down in the average Democratic year, up in the average Republican one.

[joshh]

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't..... he lets them fail and he's a job killer. Offers them a another chance, and it's a waste. I do not relish his position!

You do know that it was Bush that bailed out the auto industry don't you...lol. But if GM survives Obama will take credit of course.

[mar1t1me]

In truth they should have gone bankrupt. GM is now at a serious disadvatage because of it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswoo...kruptcy-again/

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't..... he lets them fail and he's a job killer. Offers them a another chance, and it's a waste. I do not relish his position!

[Vedubin01]

This is an embarrassingly bad mischaracterization of what happened. Seriously, please educate yourself on this issue because you're so far off the mark you sound like joshh.

Please correct him and post what really happened!

[BraveUlysses]

Apparently, I'm supposed to be more pissed about what Mitten is doing with his money than what The 0 is doing with mine.



Nice try there herbie:

January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress for the 1st time in a dozen years.

At the time, The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77, The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%, The Unemployment rate was 4.6%, George Bush ' s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH!!!!!!!!

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

THE FUCKING BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR !!!!!

Yup all Bush and the Republicans huh :crazy:

This is an embarrassingly bad mischaracterization of what happened. Seriously, please educate yourself on this issue because you're so far off the mark you sound like joshh.

[naplesE30]

Don't you mean getting blamed for it? Romney is on record as stating we should "let Detroit go bankrupt". But now, he wishes to take some credit for doing just the opposite. This guy is truly insane!

Obama's no angel, but this vulture capitalist is not going to work for the rest of us. His track record is ignored at our own peril.

In truth they should have gone bankrupt. GM is now at a serious disadvatage because of it.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswoo...kruptcy-again/

[future rs]

Could you not call our President boy? That's pretty fucking racist, i don't care what slang you think you are using.

Racist? Really? I usually try and avoid these conflicts on forums but I felt it necessary to chime in.

If we are going to say the use of "boy" is racist than you better pass that up to a federal court.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/johns...acist_language


And If we are going to get hurt in here over slur's and comments towards race it should be stated that comments like "mormon monster" could also be considered derogatory. In fact It would be nice if Mr. e30e could leave his sentiments about mormons out of the topic.

[mar1t1me]

Let's not forget Obama is taking credit for Bush bailing out the auto industry.....

Don't you mean getting blamed for it? Romney is on record as stating we should "let Detroit go bankrupt". But now, he wishes to take some credit for doing just the opposite. This guy is truly insane!

Obama's no angel, but this vulture capitalist is not going to work for the rest of us. His track record is ignored at our own peril.

[Kershaw]

Could you not call our President boy? That's pretty fucking racist, i don't care what slang you think you are using.