Hillary Sucks.

[BraveUlysses]

Who knows what Trump would do with those tools as vindictive and childish as he is.

Yes but that authoritarian bully aspect has immense appeal with so many voters.

[BraveUlysses]

Nope, just haven't seen one thing showing me trump is racist. Nando and others would brand him as racist if the video was trump talking, and that is in fact the point. Pointing out rapists, thugs and murderers were Mexican and immigrated illegally is now racist altho trump speaks the truth. He did not brand all illegals as rapists etc.
and since when do we as a people allow a president to subvert the law to further his political goals? Illegal immigration and then amnesty is a Democratic Party strategy to expand a democrat permanent majority.
Thankfully some are seeing thru the buulshit, like the man in the video, and crying foul.
And thankfully demographic studies show millennials being much more conservative than the two generations before them.

Uhhh the entire Judge Curiel incident?

Or how about trump and his father both being sued by the DoJ in the 70's for racial discrimination in their property rental practices?

[Schnitzer318is]

Snopes is a sham site. Using it as evidence is evidence of one's intelligence.

It was the first site I saw that gave the whole context of the incident. I'm sure there are others as well. At least they bothered to cover the entire incident, not just a 5 second clip that they slowed down to varying degrees over and over again. Try not to be so naive. Anyone looks like a raving lunatic at 5fps.

All media is biased (one of the reasons I cancelled cable long ago). I'll say it again. Hillary sucks... but making up health issues, or using health in general, as a party position against a candidate shows just how weak your candidate is. It's childish.

That Bloomberg article is an interesting read, if a bit lengthy, but nothing surprising (or new). We live in a state of surveillance, and it will get worse under HRC. Who knows what Trump would do with those tools as vindictive and childish as he is.

[TimeMachinE30]

I'm not burying my head in the sand. I pointed them out as real concerns (even if, after all this time and millions of wasted taxpayer dollars "investigating", they still basically have nothing) - where the health thing is so obviously just made up BS.

I also have concerns voting for a blatant racist, who btw, is also just as big of a liar as Clinton is perceived to be. I have my reasons - you have yours.

Let's focus on one thing and we can certainly entertain the other points with the same effect.

Her health thing is made up? How old is she? You could not simply agree and accept that one'should health degrades with age? Not all old people are sick.... I'm sure we have grandparents who could be a perfect counter example.... if you do... how does HRC compare? How about Trump? And recognize (MSM , Soros and others have) the media is overtly bias for HRC....the media you ingest is feeding you a favorable image of HRC, a negative view of DJT.

You are not burying your head in.the sand? This is not politics purely....if possible.. make this a black and white, comparison.... is HRC healthy or ill?

[TimeMachinE30]

Snopes is a sham site. Using it as evidence is evidence of one's intelligence.

Valerie Jarret. Soros. Bloomberg. Those on the list of the billionaires pledge. Look at the players in the game. Search them out a bit. Don't go to a single website and be satisfied. Read. Research.




Try this reading mass surveillance in Baltimore. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2...-surveillance/

If you read, a name sticks out as the donor....John and Laura Arnold. He is a billionaire, rich from Enron. Look into their "charity" a bit more. See what programs they push, etc.

[Schnitzer318is]

https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Maybe there was a rap song playing in the background we couldn't hear.

Taken out of context... as usual.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-seizure-video/

If you guys really BELIEVE this, I have a bridge to sell you. I don't like her either, but I stick to real, plausible faults. This kind of stuff makes people look like petty children hurling insults on the playground. :loco:

Johnson isnt appealing at all. I dont really agree with him on anything, so a vote for him would be no better that voting for the 2nd best option. For me it would be worse.

He doesn't REALLY appeal to me either. But he will take the most votes from both parties. Unless that changes, that's where my vote will go. These candidates suck cock (sorry for the immature way of putting that, but they do) and I don't want my vote associated with either one of them. I wish more of the country thought the same, but such is life. I'll have to live with whichever of these two clowns wins (Hillary) and so will the rest of you.

[gwb72tii]

Johnson isnt appealing at all. I dont really agree with him on anything, so a vote for him would be no better that voting for the 2nd best option. For me it would be worse.

[nando]

Johnson isnt appealing at all. I dont really agree with him on anything, so a vote for him would be no better that voting for the 2nd best option. For me it would be worse.

[roguetoaster]

Even the most jaded of politicos know that a write-in won't win, so you probably fall on one side of the H/T fence and probably want to vote for the one that makes the other lose rather than the candidate that you want to win.

[Wschnitz]

I guess I don't feel the desire to "fall in line" behind a candidate I don't care for after a preferable candidate lost.

If I was forced to vote now I'd probably vote johnson, but since I don't have to vote, maybe ill just write in Sanders just to see how much of a % he gets.

[roguetoaster]

Where's your medical degree Mr. Perfect?

[Rsully70sev]

https://youtu.be/YMHOcmDVBP0

Maybe there was a rap song playing in the background we couldn't hear.

[roguetoaster]

Since when do we as a people allow a president to subvert the law to further his political goals? Illegal immigration and then amnesty is a Democratic Party strategy to expand a democrat permanent majority.

Really, you have to ask, really? Since when does a president not use their power to subvert existing laws/make changes and further political goals. It's part of the way that this government system works since Jackson at the least.

Also, amnesty has been a thing since at least HW Bush. Second, I believe many hispanics are rather conservative, and would happily vote for a Republican if one came along who did not insult them.

[Schnitzer318is]

Please provide evidence trump is a criminal.
Btw Hillary is sinking like a rock.

Just do a quick search. Really easy to see the scumbaggery of Donald Trump. Guy is in court (sorry his lawyers are in his stead) for either civil or criminal matters more often than the members of the 80's Miami University football team. Just because he is a criminal in the professional arena and not in the political arena does not excuse him of being a criminal.

Edit: Actually it's just as easy to see the scumbaggery of the Clintons as well doing a search but I think the majority of the country will VOTE (NOT POLL) that they prefer Hillary. As I've said before, if everyone who was unhappy with the system voted for anyone but the 2 major party candidates we'd have a real statement.

[gwb72tii]

Uh, maybe by bribing a state attourney not to investigate his sham university?

It is being investigated
How about bill and his $18 million 4 year pay at the head of another for profit school