Hillary Sucks.

[M-technik-3]

Justice Dept could have indicted her long ago. I dislike the three current candidates. The whole process reeks, and just today the news has the VA Governor brought a Chinese Business man to a fund raiser for her and he gave the Foundation a nice big happy check so maybe he's looking to sleep in the Lincoln bedroom too.

[BraveUlysses]

http://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/05/did-the-clinton-email-server-have-an-internet-based-printer/

[djjerme]

If you don't like Hillary or want to see her lose this election, the timing of this couldn't be better.

True, but I feel like there is a huge section of our country that will ignore all this and claim it's just some sort of Conspiracy to keep a woman out of office (don't laugh - I've already heard it from some supposedly "educated" democrats 'round these parts.)

What ever the outcome it's probably not going to change people who only vote based on the letter next to a candidates name..

[Dozyproductions]

Has anyone noticed any of this happening? Theory: Can answer why we only have a two party system. Republicans need to be on the other side to add fuel to the class warfare and the divide and conquer strategy. As long as the media remains liberal, they can remain the counter balance to the "socialist agenda". She is part of something bigger (CFR) that has global backing. As long as the goal is control we can equate: socialism = fascism = collectivism = globalism.

Y'all can think me a kook but there I see a bigger picture forming here. We can sit here and spend all our money on cars, spend all our time watching sports or america's got talent. Refuse to question the war in fear of not "supporting our troops". News can keep distracting us with killed gorillas, panama papers, where people take shits and so forth. And now we can only choose between this insane woman and the insane trump. We can only choose within insanity... Anything to take our mind off the big picture.

I read a book by brzezinski, a while ago!!!, about our strategy during the cold war against the USSR. It outline that we should not piss off the russians too much. As he outline: that is why we shouldn't win any of the wars, that is why we invite their scientists here to share our technology and that is why we give them money. The purpose was to make the USA weak abroad. This picture completes scenario of make the USA weak from within. That is why Hillary sucks.

/tinfoil hat

[gwb72tii]

thank you

[marshallnoise]

Dozy, there is no tinfoil required. None at all. Obama was a disciple of Alinsky too as the article clipping states.

[CorvallisBMW]

[nando]

Dozy, there is no tinfoil required. None at all. Obama was a disciple of Alinsky too as the article clipping states.

you know that's fake.. right? oh, wait..

[marshallnoise]

you know that's fake.. right? oh, wait..

What is fake? Rules for Radicals? Saul Alinsky?

Are we denying reality now?

[BraveUlysses]

you know that's fake.. right? oh, wait..

Ironically, the right is the only political group that is obsessed with reading Rules for Radicals.

Just a cursory look at the 782 amazon reviews finds 208 of the reviews have 'Obama' in their review.

[Dozyproductions]

Throwing out that picture, our saying 'thats fake' or even saying conspiracy without anything to back it up is being lazy and shutting down discussion before it can get anywhere. Being pretentious is not an argument and it might as well one of the bullet points within the divide and conquer strategy. If you wan't to change my mind, or at least open it up, point me in the direction of what I can read or look at. I'm not so set in my ways where I'm just going to deny what you say just because you guys choose to be lazy and annoying lol. The goal here is to know what the hell is going on. Not to just have fun with pointing fingers.

Brave: Is that Ironic or is that sad that the left doesn't truly understand who they really worship?

Read some of these neo con and liberal politicians' books. (They're awful if you're looking for something fun and they are numerous) They spell it right for you. What was, is, and what will be of our tragic domestic and foreign policy right to the T. None of you jokers can rebut what these people write but you can sure as hell choose to ignore it.

Side not in order to remain on topic to this thread:
One of my friends bought one of Hillary's books and she mentions t the tune: United States needs to continue to create destabilization in the middle east in order to secure resources for ourselves (vs. china and india) so we can continue ensuring that the world remains at peace since there can only be room for one super power. If you can't tell by now, that power having to be us.

So she's advocating terror, in the guise of fighting terror, in order to try to achieve a unrealistic and unsustainable peace. Plus those resources, once our men and women are done dying for them, have to pass through middle men before they end up being consumed by us. Where have we been hearing this story from? Has anyone read the book, 'War is a Racket' by smedley butler? The pattern just repeats itself.

You elect Bernie but guess what? He will continue to enforce those aforementioned bullet points but with nicer wrapping.

[nando]

Its fake because its been proven so - I've seen it before. The book is real, but not Obama's association - that part is a fantasy, much like the nightmare dreamworld you choose to live in.

[Dozyproductions]

So is the only part that is fake is Obama's participation in his thesis concerning the matter? If that's the case, I'll use the energy that is my conspiratorial paranoia to confirm it ;)

As of the nightmare dreamworld you accuse me of living in. I suggest you look a little bit further in to what Clinton has written and what she is saying. It doesn't necessarily add up. Even at a casual glance you can see puzzle pieces falling together. As I said again, have you read War is a racket?

You can even listen to it here

I guess you can brush off this decorated major general as a liar and if so, I can't go any further for you there.

But if you like puzzles (paranoia puzzle can be bought for $9.99 at your local walmart!), the pieces start fitting smoothly together. What the end result, to this point, to your credit is up to interpretation but let's continue with the nightmare.

The EU is a non democratic collective state that continues to bite off a little more and a little more of the sovereignty of each european state. (The arguments for and against that can be seen in the Brexit debates.) I tend to agree with what Farage says because the evidence is in plain site w/ the current happenings of the entire western europe. Follow this because the foundations of how this country was founded and the democratic values the european states, wished to have attained after WWII, have been nullified with this once "economic treaty". So now un elected officials have the say over millions of people in one size fits all policies. Is that for the greater good or not? Why does Brussels wish to operate like this?

Im involved in that trend because, being polish, I've seen how the EU has "warned" poland to get their shit together with the constitutional supreme court. The problem is that the situation is a lot more complicated then what is told on the surface and EU bullying Poland in such a matter is not acceptable. A little background for that is the leaving communists (social democrats) illegally selected 2 out of five judges. The new right wing party cancelled their dictate and has appointed 5 new judges. Not correct but it's an internal matter not a brussels matter.

What does this have to do with Obama and Clinton? At the drop of the hat, Obama came to Cameron's help and gave a stern 'warning' that Britain better behave or they will be put on the back of the line in trade negotiations. He supports this bureaucratic behemoth that no longer has, if ever, the interests of its people in mind. So he can tell us he supports freedom but then across the pond say that he supports tight collective control. Clinton and Obama have very similar ideologies, and paired with what I mentioned before makes for a very worrisome future if she is elected president.

Then to check off another bullet point, this is whats happening in california in regards to guns is this: Read please
I can assume that it's a non issue for you but it's slowly making a constitutional right illegal. Next, pistols will be assault rifles the way its going lol. Already by 2017, we will not be able to buy glocks in CA, or many other major manufacturers' pistols.

And this is just what is happening now. The past events that I mentioned of our strategies during the cold war leading up till now has not been for the best interests for US or for the 'western world'. You can see it for yourself? We are fighting a war on terror. How can you fight terror? With more terror? Like a 'I can't believe it's not terror'? Who says when it's over? Who is profiting from this? How are you and I benefiting from it. The results so far is a debt that will only blossom further and more of our freedoms, in acts like the patriot act (remember?), taken away. This debt will be funneled to the people who pay for the campaigns of our politicians while the rest of us pay the price. The "decline of our education system" with common core and over testing will lower the quality of the education our kids get and they will be further brainwashed with thinking that who won 'the voice' is more important than knowing what the hell Memorial Day is for. Yes, there are a lot of people, of the younger generation, who don't know what Memorial days (beyond for drinking) or who Washington D.C. was named after.

We will experience higher taxes, lower quality of living, and with deals like the TPP even more jobs going abroad. The trade tariffs were already low to begin with. Why do we have to lower them even further? Perhaps to make it even cheaper to export the labor to increase profits when the goods are sold back to the consumer back here? Why do people whose job it is to watch over our security are so easily giving it away? Are you seeing this trend changing any time soon with the people you want to elect in office?

You cannot answer, because these people we elect are stupid or simply corrupt. Most of them have law degrees or other esteemed forms of education. Those answers are too easy and even you can give them more credit than ruining an entire country for some spare change. This is the nightmare that not only I live in but, you as well brother.

All of this only scratches the surface but you'll only think of the other stuff as lunacy so I'll refrain from saying any of it. Again, I'll do my digging as you suggested but please do the same of what I've suggested.

[Need4Speed1299]

he worries me far less than the traitor masquerading as presidential candidate.

And Hillery foreign policy knowledge is so much better??????

FFS she testified under oath than no one died directly due to her decision making process and "what difference does it make" anyway that they did. Yes people die due to risky jobs and being in harms way in unstable places, but I would not be able to sleep at night knowing people under my umbrella of responsibility died because I didnt do everything in my power to get them help when they called for it and needed it the most.........

FUCK Her.

This.

[BraveUlysses]

Brave: Is that Ironic or is that sad that the left doesn't truly understand who they really worship?

Do they really worship it if most aren't even remotely familiar with the book itself? If the fear of the tactics espoused by the book are your concern, who's the current market for the book? Apparently it's conservatives.