Tubular Front Sub frame and Custom Pan for dual pump set up
Collapse
X
-
Subscribed for talk of stock S50US pan clearance.'89 325is S50 Track Montser
'04 X5 Daily/Tow Vehicle
http://www.avarestoration.com
http://www.myspace.com/brendanfiddle
Click here if you want to be my zombie slave...
http://www.youtube.com/user/Fidhle007
Comment
-
No, my swaybar will be mounted in font of the steering rack. What I meant was the end of the swaybar ends up close to the same position this way as compared to the stock configuration.
The question on the standard S50 pans will need to be looked into I am not sure on this, if anyone has one that they would like me to test fit please let me know and I will do it. Otherwise I could take measurements off my e36 and compare that to the set up.
SamComment
-
I have my swaybar in front of the steering rack and adjustable endlinks, on M3.
I have the TMS endlinks, but I probably need to make them longer to get the right angle.
My oilpan and subframe is modified.1987 BMW E30 M3 RB26
2016 VW Polo 1.2 TSI R-Line
Originally posted by 5spokeFucking norway and your sick clean ass e30's! Yes i am yelling!Comment
-
ok weird question. If you keep the dual sump pan (s50b52 or s54) does the oil level sensor bolt in and function still? and if so does it still fit after the modification? I dont remember where my s54 pan went to check.e30sport.net
'86 325es - s54b32tu - 6-speed - Mtech 1
'89 325is - m20b25 - 5-speed - Individual​
'06 M3 Competition - 6-speed
'19 Porsche GT3 RS - 7-speed PDK
'94 Lancia Delta HF Integrale EvoII - Giallo Ginestra
'97 Range Rover VitesseComment
-
Mine did fit and, but since I have M3 I don't have the oil level light on the check panel.1987 BMW E30 M3 RB26
2016 VW Polo 1.2 TSI R-Line
Originally posted by 5spokeFucking norway and your sick clean ass e30's! Yes i am yelling!Comment
-
Can you make the steering rack mounts smaller to accept the E36 rack without spacers? Seems to me that anyone doing the S54 swap wouldn't be running a stock E30 steering rack with the 4:1 ratio, or even the stock M3 3.5:1. I have an E36 3:1 rack in my car and would want one less custom part so I'd have the subframe sized for the E36 rack... Thoughts?
What other advantages does this provide over an E34 pan? Seems like $1k is a lot to spend on a setup that will be quite custom, when an E34 pan and pickup is $100 and bolts right up to the S5X engines... Don't get me wrong, I'm interested and in the market for one of these right now so I might buy one, just want all the details.'88 M3.2 S54 Lachssilber/Black
'07 335i Alpine/Black Sedan
'12 X5 3.5i Alpine/Black
iS Splitters For Sale, PM ME!
sigpicComment
-
I can do the subframe for any rack, but if the mounting is different (obviously) I would need you to send the rack with and I will make mounts for it. The price right now is 600 dollars un powdercoated, plus return shipping.
As far as the different pans go, etc. I will have to ask Sam (lag) to respond to that because Im just a fabricator and his is the first BMW I have ever been involved with.Comment
-
I can do the subframe for any rack, but if the mounting is different (obviously) I would need you to send the rack with and I will make mounts for it. The price right now is 600 dollars un powdercoated, plus return shipping.
As far as the different pans go, etc. I will have to ask Sam (lag) to respond to that because Im just a fabricator and his is the first BMW I have ever been involved with.Comment
-
I decided to go with this set up first and foremost because I have heard of M50 pump failures at the track. Here is one example that was detailed on s14.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyboost
We've had the opposite results on ours, with severe pickup issues using the e34 pan. After a few attempts and pumps, lasting just a few track minutes, we went dry sump and the problem was solved. Car was fine on the street and dyno with the e34 pan, but the second we threw it around the track, oil pickup immediately became an issue.
I realize I am an exception, but it definitely can happen...
Because of experiences like this I am not confident in the M50 pump for the S54 if it has failed on the euro motors, and I say this because of the higher redline which is spinning that pump much further past where it was designed IMO. I am not willing to take that risk. Some might but I want to drive with confidence and wondering if I am the exception.
I also chose the dual pick up system because it is a better system. Plain and simple the design is better, if a single front sump was best BMW would have used that on all their M cars.
I do like the additional clearance that the S54 pan provides as well. here is a picture of the M50 pan in an E30 with the AKG motor mounts:
You can see that the m50 pan hangs past the subframe by quite a bit. With this set up the subframe is the lowest point.
To sum stuff up:
M50 pumps= some have lasted, some have failed, you can take your chances
E34 pan= fits without modification, just don't lower your car too much.
dual pickup pan/pump= modifications to the subframe and pan and will provide proper oiling (designed by BMW for these motors), more clearance and you can leave your firewall intact.
This set up= More oil capacity
These are the reasons that made me choose to go this route.Comment
-
To sum stuff up:
M50 pumps= some have lasted, some have failed, you can take your chances
E34 pan= fits without modification, just don't lower your car too much.
dual pickup pan/pump= modifications to the subframe and pan and will provide proper oiling (designed by BMW for these motors), more clearance and you can leave your firewall intact.
This set up= More oil capacity
These are the reasons that made me choose to go this route.Comment
Comment