Let's see how much m20 heads suck.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ForcedFirebird
    R3V OG
    • Feb 2007
    • 8300

    #16
    Soon. We have to make a testing tube to be accurate. A flange and a few inches of piping welded up will do the trick.

    Today we will test the "ported" head fully to see how consistent the previous owner was.
    john@m20guru.com
    Links:
    Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

    Comment

    • digger
      R3V Elite
      • Nov 2005
      • 5911

      #17
      how consistent are the tests, a large clay bellmouth at the opening would seem to add some variability, why not get something solid that bolts on and has some length to it like a runner?
      89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

      new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

      Comment

      • Danny
        Moderator
        • Feb 2008
        • 14217

        #18
        I don't know what any of those numbers mean.

        Comment

        • NigelStu
          E30 Modder
          • Oct 2010
          • 827

          #19
          Originally posted by ForcedFirebird
          Soon. We have to make a testing tube to be accurate. A flange and a few inches of piping welded up will do the trick.

          Today we will test the "ported" head fully to see how consistent the previous owner was.
          Results please.


          And close-up pics of the porting.
          Ben
          Thelma-Louise, the '88is Chump Car - back to M20 power!

          2014 ChumpCar Season Schedule!
          April 5-6 Autobahn, IL - Sat: 1st! Sun: 3rd
          May23-25 Watkins Glen, NY: 4th, 5th, 4th
          October 4 PittRace Sprints: 2nd in C-class
          October 18-19 NCM, Bowling Green KY: 2nd, 1st!
          Nov 1-2 Watkins Glen - Chumpionship - 1st car to exit the race with significant body damage :(

          Find us on FB! Schaut Speed Motorsports

          Comment

          • ForcedFirebird
            R3V OG
            • Feb 2007
            • 8300

            #20
            Originally posted by digger
            how consistent are the tests, a large clay bellmouth at the opening would seem to add some variability, why not get something solid that bolts on and has some length to it like a runner?
            This is common procedure for flowing bare heads. When doing port research, the manifold will be attached as well as a throttle body minus the plate. The clay may vary 1cfm or so pending the shape, but when you lightly peel it off, it stays near it's original form.

            Originally posted by Danny
            I don't know what any of those numbers mean.
            It's how many cubic feet per minute the ports flow.

            Originally posted by NigelStu
            Results please.


            And close-up pics of the porting.
            Close up pics of what porting? The original owner of the "ported" head we flowed used pics on the internet to ruin his head. Pics won't do anything for you.

            We have almost decade of porting and flowing experience, you actually have to feel the ports with your finger tips to know what was done.

            Here's a close up of some iron heads I ported. You can look at the pics all you want, but without a flow bench and flow testing tools, it's nearly impossible to copy from pics. It took several hours on and off the bench testing for dead spots and grinding out just a tiny bit here and there. Not only that, but the typical back yard mechanic doesn't have a way to measure volume, and how can you look at a pic and tell how much and where the material was removed in the chamber?





            And here's a few plots of that head. Bottom line is stock, next line is after many tests and hours, the top is the flow when the heads left my shop.

            Last edited by ForcedFirebird; 02-17-2018, 10:52 PM.
            john@m20guru.com
            Links:
            Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

            Comment

            • FredK
              R3V OG
              • Oct 2003
              • 14740

              #21
              Nice. That's a huge difference! This will make strokers even more potent!

              Comment

              • ForcedFirebird
                R3V OG
                • Feb 2007
                • 8300

                #22
                Don't expect that from the m20. Old school iron heads with rectangular ports have a lot of potential where the m20 already flows well for it's size.
                john@m20guru.com
                Links:
                Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                Comment

                • Jean
                  Moderator
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 18228

                  #23
                  Nice! to compare, a 2.2L H22 honda stock head is about 272 cfm .

                  I am curious what M30B35 and M60B40 heads flow, any chance you have those on hand?
                  Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205



                  OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827

                  Comment

                  • downforce22
                    No R3VLimiter
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 3186

                    #24
                    Very interesting results. I am curious to see how these results compare to real numbers. Obviously porting could help flow on larger displacements or larger cams, but how does it affect a stock m20. I believe the engineers designed it pretty well to begin with and increasing the flow numbers will decrease the flow speed out of the head. I am not claiming to be an expert but there was a compromise made by the head designers and I am skeptical that on a stock m20b25 there is much gain to be made on the inlet and exhaust side. How does the sacrifice of inlet speed for overall flow help on a near stock m20?

                    With that being said, your adjustments look quite interesting. There is no doubt that those increases shown in your graph would help on a turbo m20 or larger displacement m20. I am interested in small adjustments that could be made. Like inlet and exhaust port matching. I would suspect it would help flow both into and out of the head by creating a smooth tract that minimizes turbulence in the flow and helps the engine flow better at higher RPM. Are you doing small adjustments like this or actual adjustments within the inlet and exhaust tract of the head itself?
                    318iS Track Rat :nice: www.drive4corners.com
                    '86 325iX 3.1 Stroker Turbo '86 S38B36 325

                    No one makes this car anymore. The government won't allow them, normal people won't buy them. So it's up to us: the freaks, the weirdos, the informed. To buy them, to appreciate them, and most importantly, to drive them.

                    Comment

                    • ForcedFirebird
                      R3V OG
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 8300

                      #25
                      Not at the moment. The big six has a different bolt pattern, doesn't it? That would just require a new adapter, anyways.
                      john@m20guru.com
                      Links:
                      Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                      Comment

                      • Jean
                        Moderator
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 18228

                        #26
                        If you were closer I would ship you my m60b40/m62b44 heads :) It doesn't look like it's very complicated to measure CFM? Do you have to account for temp and elevation/pressure?
                        Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205



                        OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827

                        Comment

                        • ForcedFirebird
                          R3V OG
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 8300

                          #27
                          It's not complicated. Just took building the plenum and purchasing about $3000 in equipment, vacuum sources, piping, wood, aluminum etc.
                          john@m20guru.com
                          Links:
                          Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                          Comment

                          • Jean
                            Moderator
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 18228

                            #28
                            $3k? doh.
                            Mtech1 v8 build thread - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho...d.php?t=413205



                            OEM v8 manual chip or dme - https://www.r3vlimited.com/board/sho....php?p=4938827

                            Comment

                            • ForcedFirebird
                              R3V OG
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 8300

                              #29
                              Probably more, don't remind me lol.
                              john@m20guru.com
                              Links:
                              Transaction feedback: Here, here and here. Thanks :D

                              Comment

                              • digger
                                R3V Elite
                                • Nov 2005
                                • 5911

                                #30
                                Originally posted by downforce22
                                Very interesting results. I am curious to see how these results compare to real numbers. Obviously porting could help flow on larger displacements or larger cams, but how does it affect a stock m20. I believe the engineers designed it pretty well to begin with and increasing the flow numbers will decrease the flow speed out of the head. I am not claiming to be an expert but there was a compromise made by the head designers and I am skeptical that on a stock m20b25 there is much gain to be made on the inlet and exhaust side. How does the sacrifice of inlet speed for overall flow help on a near stock m20?

                                With that being said, your adjustments look quite interesting. There is no doubt that those increases shown in your graph would help on a turbo m20 or larger displacement m20. I am interested in small adjustments that could be made. Like inlet and exhaust port matching. I would suspect it would help flow both into and out of the head by creating a smooth tract that minimizes turbulence in the flow and helps the engine flow better at higher RPM. Are you doing small adjustments like this or actual adjustments within the inlet and exhaust tract of the head itself?
                                you can work out the hp potential from the CFM, the stock head at 170cfm is about 260 bhp.

                                Any increase from this adds to this proportionally to the potential. The key word is potential, the real hp will depend on:
                                - how well the system as an overall system flows
                                - what rpm the exhaust is tuned for (primary and secondary length and diameter)
                                - camshaft events and profile
                                - what rpm the intake is tuned for (intake runner length and diameter, plenum size)
                                89 E30 325is Lachs Silber - currently M20B31, M20B33 in the works, stroked to the hilt...

                                new build thread http://www.r3vlimited.com/board/showthread.php?t=317505

                                Comment

                                Working...