Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interest in Bolt on Turbo kit?
Collapse
X
-
Can the headbolts be replaced with out removing the head or damaging the existing seal? Wonder what would happen if you did them one at a time.
-
Originally posted by wazzu70 View PostPSI really does not have anything to do with it. Different turbos move the same CFM at different PSI/pressure. What you really need to determine the weak link is peak torque which is related to combustion cylinder pressure.
If you dont have the ability to tune yourself, you can always listen to the engine using "det cans" which is way better than a generic knock sensor. Your brain processes the signals pretty darn well and you dont need to program a knock box. Look up det cans online and you will see how to make the cheap and easily. Use these to determine how much max pressure you can target with your particular tune/fuel octane.
Im in WA so we have only 91 too :(
Awesome! Thanks for the guidance!
Leave a comment:
-
PSI really does not have anything to do with it. Different turbos move the same CFM at different PSI/pressure. What you really need to determine the weak link is peak torque which is related to combustion cylinder pressure.
If you dont have the ability to tune yourself, you can always listen to the engine using "det cans" which is way better than a generic knock sensor. Your brain processes the signals pretty darn well and you dont need to program a knock box. Look up det cans online and you will see how to make the cheap and easily. Use these to determine how much max pressure you can target with your particular tune/fuel octane.
Im in WA so we have only 91 too :(
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wazzu70 View PostThe pistons can sustain the power with a good tune although they will be much more easily damaged by detonation so you have to keep the timing safe. You would also want to regap the rings if the pistons are out to help them deal with the heat.
Assuming your tune is decent so you arent hammering the snot out of the pistons, the rods are the weakest link.
Forged pistons have a lot of advantages though as you can set the ring spacing different, increase crown thickness, change compression, ect. Just because stockers can work does not mean its the best path...its the best cheap path.
Hmm.. I read somewhere that the M42 stock crank and rods are forged, but the pistons are cast. Hence, why I figured they were the weak link.
Anyway, that doesn't make your statement any less true. I plan on running stock pistons until they need replacing and I'm trying to guage how much boost I can get away with (for 20k or so miles) on Jake's MAF tune. What scares me the most is the lack of a knock sensor in these cars! I've been doing a little searching around the interwebz to see what others have done with 10:1 CR and the highest (on a street car) I've seen anyone admit to was 15psi, but that was on 93 octane and we only get 91 here in Portland, OR. So, I'm thinking my target should be about 12psi.
Thoughts?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dpmcdonald View PostInteresting. The pistons are the weakest link, yes? I wonder what would be a "safe" level of boost with ARP studs and a nice tune on a MAF—15psi? Or would it just be a ticking time bomb?
Assuming your tune is decent so you arent hammering the snot out of the pistons, the rods are the weakest link.
Forged pistons have a lot of advantages though as you can set the ring spacing different, increase crown thickness, change compression, ect. Just because stockers can work does not mean its the best path...its the best cheap path.
Leave a comment:
-
would this bolt on turbine work for the same m42 auto? asking bc a friend is interested in the kit
Leave a comment:
-
Interest in Bolt on Turbo kit?
Originally posted by jakeb View PostMy buddy's e21 that we designed the tune on was over boosting for a bit when he has the wastegate preload set wrong. He was around 14psi for awhile and it held. He did dial it back to 9psi just to be sure.
This is on an m42 with around 160k on it and the clutch that came with the engine. Now...who knows if it is stock or how many miles are on it. But he thrashes it pretty good.
So ARPs..a good clutch. m20 would be good...and go to 15psi it will be happy. We might need to tweek the tune some.
Interesting. The pistons are the weakest link, yes? I wonder what would be a "safe" level of boost with ARP studs and a nice tune on a MAF—15psi? Or would it just be a ticking time bomb?Last edited by dpmcdonald; 07-31-2014, 08:11 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MikeW View Postbased on the WRX results the virtual dyno app I am using estimates low numbers. It could be the street because the app calibrates friction loss after you accelerate, so if there is a slight change in slope over the course this could bias the results up or down. I ran the WRX and M42T on the exact same street, at the same starting point. So based on the WRX results we appear to be 10 to 20 hp low.
Regardless, it's a hell of an improvement and the shape of the curve is going to be very accurate, regardless of power levels. The torque curve hits perfect for a DD in my opinion..
Actual dyno or not, it's great data regardless and I thank you for your time in collecting and putting it together! This should be solid confirmation for anyone who is still on the fence about ordering this kit.
Order the kit people!
Leave a comment:
-
based on the WRX results the virtual dyno app I am using estimates low numbers. It could be the street because the app calibrates friction loss after you accelerate, so if there is a slight change in slope over the course this could bias the results up or down. I ran the WRX and M42T on the exact same street, at the same starting point. So based on the WRX results we appear to be 10 to 20 hp low.
Regardless, it's a hell of an improvement and the shape of the curve is going to be very accurate, regardless of power levels. The torque curve hits perfect for a DD in my opinion..
Leave a comment:
-
Wanted to throw something out there specifically about Jake's tune. I am running my own custom setup. Its similar to Jake's kit, but defiantly not the same. I was running jakes tune at first before swapping over to megasquirt. I recently had my car on the dyno and made 180hp/185tq at the wheels Sae corrected on a dynojet. Jake's tune was defiantly more powerful than these numbers. The car pulled much harder before I swapped over to MS. I wouldn't be surprised if his kit made 190-195whp.
Leave a comment:
-
Its done on a virtual dyno from data thats been logged. These are flywheel numbers though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MikeW View PostWell, I know some have waited a long time for this.
1991 318i M42
Boosted with Jake's Kit
9 psi
torque at the flywheel
Great looking numbers! Was this on a flywheel dyno?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MikeW View PostThink I can take it up to 15 psi with just ARPs and clutch swap? I don't think my clutch is stock but won't know till I get inside. No problems so far.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is on an m42 with around 160k on it and the clutch that came with the engine. Now...who knows if it is stock or how many miles are on it. But he thrashes it pretty good.
So ARPs..a good clutch. m20 would be good...and go to 15psi it will be happy. We might need to tweek the tune some.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: