The 15 Y/O Turbo M42 Build Thread (Now Holley EFI Terminator X Controlled)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MF DOOM
    replied
    Originally posted by Bar73k
    Here's my map for a m42 turbo,

    107% load = 22psi
    100% load = 20psi
    i think 42% = 0psi

    these are old maps which i have since changed a fair bit






    Ill load mine tonight. I know i have a datalog somewhere of my idle settings. Are you using an icv? Im not running one on mine and it idles smooth as can be at 500rpm. Cold starts are perfect. Hot starts have issues because of what e30guy mentioned. Needs more enrichment. but anyways, heres theses. hopefully theyre useful

    Leave a comment:


  • e30guydownunder
    replied
    For you startup issue it just looks like not enough enrichment. Admititly I am on E85 so it is a bit but at 10-20 degrees Celcius I am running up to 200% enrichment. Generally it will be linear.

    For sure I would be running richer. We tuned for a flat 12.0 AFR on my thing when on boost. I also think that your ignition values look quite high when on boost. But this really needs to be done on a dyno to know exactly what is going on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    interesting. Im going to start making changes to the timing and fuel but i want to focus just on the start up and idle first before I move further.

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Starting/base AFR table should look something like this (in lambda values):


    Timing for a 24V boosted motor should look something like this:

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    Originally posted by Good & Tight
    Your timing looks high also, I'm no expert on 4 valve head tuning but I know for a fact the require a lot less timing than a 2 valve head. I'll see if I can dig up some timing maps for you.
    thank you for the help. It is appreciated greatly:D

    Leave a comment:


  • Good & Tight
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    timing table up



    G&T Is there any particular reason why my afr table looks nothing like what you posted other than the guy that tuned my car has no idea wtf hes doing? lol
    Your timing looks high also, I'm no expert on 4 valve head tuning but I know for a fact the require a lot less timing than a 2 valve head. I'll see if I can dig up some timing maps for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    timing table up



    G&T Is there any particular reason why my afr table looks nothing like what you posted other than the guy that tuned my car has no idea wtf hes doing? lol

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Originally posted by Good & Tight
    Your afr table should look like this. Use the auto tune feature also, it allows you to drive and tune at the same time.

    Truth!

    Leave a comment:


  • Good & Tight
    replied
    Your afr table should look like this. Use the auto tune feature also, it allows you to drive and tune at the same time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    Originally posted by wazzu70
    If your coils are wired into the same voltage source as the ECU that would not be good then.

    Both ignition and injection have issues at lower voltage. Injectors need more open time and ignition needs more dwell.

    Does MS have battery voltage compensation?
    its a straight pnp unit so all chassis wiring/engine harness is OEM, and yes MS does compensate voltage. there are several settings directly related to it that I have left un touched so far


    Originally posted by wazzu70
    I wish you lived closer, I would want a ride in your turbo beast :) I would also help you sort out your issues!
    IMO a tuner who doesn't bother with dialing in starting and idle isnt a tuner at all. You cant only do the easy part and pass on the hard part.

    I will see if I can DL TunerStudio and help get some things sorted out. I have been curious what TS is like anyway :)
    I would really appreciate it! It would be nice to have someone make changes to my tune while driving. Its hard to do both ha
    but yes I couldnt agree more, Its really a shame because I paid a LOT of money to have this done properly. I didnt just spend countles hours research and fabricating to have a car like this be anything less than turn key. :(

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    true, but its been done and It can be done. Ive come to the conclusion that if I want my car to run properly im going to have to tune it myself. If you want something done right these days its really the only option (at least this is my experience with tuning so far)


    Ive taken the car to be dyno'd TWICE, and it still idles poorly and wont start. It runs fine when driving and pulls like crazy under boost. It just seems like the guys that did my tune didnt really care about the fine details and I guess thats where I come in.

    My target AFRs at idle are 13.4 ish. Either warm or cold it seems to want more fuel to idle smoothly, especially when I kick on an accessory and put extra load on the charging system (cooling fan or distilled mist)


    If I give it more fuel it seems to have better throttle response too. I donno, ill wait for some tuning pros on here to chime in because Im well aware that I am NOT a professional at MS.
    I wish you lived closer, I would want a ride in your turbo beast :) I would also help you sort out your issues!

    IMO a tuner who doesn't bother with dialing in starting and idle isnt a tuner at all. You cant only do the easy part and pass on the hard part.

    I will see if I can DL TunerStudio and help get some things sorted out. I have been curious what TS is like anyway :)

    Leave a comment:


  • Good & Tight
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    and my target AFR table.
    You better fatten up those afr's above 100kpa or it's gonna go boom in a hurry. Under boost it should be 12.0 and under. Post up your timing table you buttchug.

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Originally posted by Dj Buttchug
    my volt meter reads 13.5 however when data logging it reads less. Something doesnt seem right here.

    I have a datalog from a drive i took the other day. Im not sure how to show it here.
    If your coils are wired into the same voltage source as the ECU that would not be good then.

    Both ignition and injection have issues at lower voltage. Injectors need more open time and ignition needs more dwell.

    Does MS have battery voltage compensation?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dj Buttchug
    replied
    Originally posted by Lof8
    I'll be honest, boost, tuning, and MS scare the shit out of me. All I ever read is horror stories about people trying to get their tune right.
    true, but its been done and It can be done. Ive come to the conclusion that if I want my car to run properly im going to have to tune it myself. If you want something done right these days its really the only option (at least this is my experience with tuning so far)


    Ive taken the car to be dyno'd TWICE, and it still idles poorly and wont start. It runs fine when driving and pulls like crazy under boost. It just seems like the guys that did my tune didnt really care about the fine details and I guess thats where I come in.

    My target AFRs at idle are 13.4 ish. Either warm or cold it seems to want more fuel to idle smoothly, especially when I kick on an accessory and put extra load on the charging system (cooling fan or distilled mist)


    If I give it more fuel it seems to have better throttle response too. I donno, ill wait for some tuning pros on here to chime in because Im well aware that I am NOT a professional at MS.

    Leave a comment:


  • wazzu70
    replied
    Tuning is not bad at all, you just need a desire to learn and a fundamental understanding of how an IC engine operates.

    Many people would be smart to have a professional shop wire in and test the unit and set up the base configuration though!

    Leave a comment:

Working...