California is supposedly a non-fault state. I'm not sure it ends up working out that way in reality though. I think more often than not the person who did the rear-ending, regardless of whether or not they are responsible for the conditions that resulted in the rear-ending, are held at fault. I hope in this case that's not what happens.
As an aside- did the cops who responded to the scene mention anything about the smog legality of your car?
As an aside- did the cops who responded to the scene mention anything about the smog legality of your car?
Comment