Most blasphemous words I have ever read...

[Holland]

At least when he blows by me on the track in his fire breathing 332is, I will have the comfort of knowing my door panels are secure and comfortable.

[fiftytakedowns]

e30s are cheaper and funner than miatas. hes a moron lol. and im going to lol at him when the m reverts back to a turbo 4 cyl....one day...

>e30s are cheaper and funner than miatas
>e30s are cheaper and funner
>e30s are funner
>funner



I dont know,

m3 evos??
267 hp s14 > 240 hp s50s ??
Does he not put suspension on cars that have body roll or something, I could be naive, but Im sure once 'prepped' the m3's are quite a machine, maybe not from the factory though.

[bimmer_E30]

but btw from my personal opinion. honda Vtec 4 bangers. Do sound very nice. raw N/A power. to bad FWD, lack of torque part. non the less fun to drive.

[IminDiegoTriick]

I want to kill him.




JK


haha no but really though if he was local & I knew him I respectfully would thrown down on him. lol

[PReta]

e30s have soul :)

[emoshun]

^ ssssshhhhh

[StereoInstaller1]

He is right

[bimmer_E30]

Lol. kid is butthurt.

[Dj Buttchug]

whoever it is, he's obviously a complete douche nozzle

[xwill112x]

e30s are cheaper and funner than miatas. hes a moron lol. and im going to lol at him when the m reverts back to a turbo 4 cyl....one day...

[Big Willy]

"the God-awful din of a tuned 4 cylinder car...."

There will be blood,

all I can say is the E30 M3 has heritage and legendary status, when driving one the connection to the 1980's Ultimate Driving Machine courses through the spine. Who cares about being fast, the owner of the newer M3 wants to validate his purchase just as much as E30 M3 owners want to validate theirs, but he is missing the point, obviously.

[freeride53]

How cliche....but it seems 'said e30 owner' had talked crap about his car.

[Be30mer]

I'm so sick of hearing the verbal diarrhea from e30 m3 owners. So they pull 195 hp out of a 4 cylinder engine and can go to 60 in around 7 seconds. The point is, that although their cars are more rare than latter m3 models, they perform worse in almost every objective performance category. 0-60, quarter mile, skidpad yadda yadda.

So their cars were 'groundbreaking' for the time and all that crap. Model T was groundbreaking for its time, but if a model T owner started putting down Ferraris or any car which spanks their own in so many categories, a good scoff would be in order. Likewise, all these geezers and M 'purists' who put down newer Ms because they aren't carbon copies of the original M3 are just grasping at straws because our newer Ms are empirically and thus objectively, far better cars.

"yes, but I can throw my e30 into corners." Awesome I can throw my e36 into corners too because it doesn't run on skinny wimpy little tires. Then I can accelerate out of those corners much faster and spank you down a straight without hearing the God-awful din of a tuned 4 cylinder car.

What are their criteria for claiming e30 superiority since it clearly is not set in empirical data? It's all this impossible to measure "driver experience" that I hear about. Well my driving experience in newer M cars is pretty friggin good too. Sour grapes because you e30ers are in the honda filled less-than-200 hp club. Except Hondas have bigger tires and nicer sounding 4 bangers.

e30s suck. If you want a great handling car that is underpowered get a miata for half the price. However if you want to hang with the big boys, get a modern contender so you don't have to put down our cars out of insecurity.

From m3f. Opinions?