Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Not that it matters but, gays?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    you either didnt watch the video all the way through or i'm not sure what point you're trying to make....?
    AWD > RWD

    Comment


      Originally posted by Kershaw View Post
      you either didnt watch the video all the way through or i'm not sure what point you're trying to make....?
      Oh man you got me! I was so tweaked by the first minute i couldnt deal. Well proves my intolerance right there!
      Swanny!
      SUCKERS.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Swanny View Post
        Oh man you got me! I was so tweaked by the first minute i couldnt deal. Well proves my intolerance right there!

        < this guy saw the humor ;) :giggle:
        BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

        Comment


          Yea I say it's not genetic. It depends on how they were raised and their experiences during those vulnerable times while growing up and learning who they are.

          And I've met several gay people that said themselves that they don't think it's genetic and that they chose and some even knew at what point in their lives that swayed them the other way.

          And 2 sticks or 2 woman holes don't make a baby so I don't see how it would be genetic. I don't remember where but I've seen pretty good evidence (scientifically) that its not genetic. I don't agree with it but I also don't treat them any different. . They are humans just with different beliefs.

          Also seems that a bunch of people have a misrepresentation/ignorance of Christianity. They're going off what they heard or read on a few churches or organizations at one point and automatically group the whole bunch in that. If that thinking was applied to other aspects of society, all black people would be looked at as thugs and ignorant ghetto welfare babies, all rush people would be looked at as snobs with their noses in the air and they sh*t don't stink, all blondes are dumb.... I could go on but am I getting to close to home.

          It's that type of thinking that hurts society. Perpetuating stereotypes.
          Last edited by kwill22; 10-20-2012, 07:31 AM.
          DENY IGNORANCE!
          Schwarz 325-totaled
          brilliantrot 318i-daily

          Originally posted by mkcman17
          don't think your hamster wheels are fast now. you will still have to give up when trying to pass that V6 odyssey to make your offramp.

          Comment


            Originally posted by kwill22 View Post
            Yea I say it's not genetic. It depends on how they were raised and their experiences during those vulnerable times while growing up and learning who they are.

            And I've met several gay people that said themselves that they don't think it's genetic and that they chose and some even knew at what point in their lives that swayed them the other way.

            And 2 sticks or 2 woman holes don't make a baby so I don't see how it would be genetic. I don't remember where but I've seen pretty good evidence (scientifically) that its not genetic. I don't agree with it but I also don't treat them any different. . They are humans just with different beliefs.
            imma stop you right there http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/...reducation.uk3
            BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

            Comment


              Originally posted by kwill22 View Post
              And I've met several gay people that said themselves that they don't think it's genetic
              and what are their qualifications to make that statement? the fact that they are gay? lol.

              that's a hilarious statement to make. "im gay and this is what i think (even though i failed HS science class, lol guys!) and since im gay and have firsthand experience with being gay i must be right!"

              no.

              A casual stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche.

              faith or belief in something does not mean it's true.

              there are millions of genetic markers that trip due to your social environment. people with the same propensity to get schizophrenia might go their entire lives without getting it, or due to some stress, the marker might get set off. this quasi-genetic/environmental conditioning field is a relatively new field and there is so much more for us to learn.

              however, if the basis for homosexuality and indeed attraction in general were NOT in the genes and strictly societal, you would find cultures where homosexuality does not exist. however that is not the case, you find the same levels of homosexuality across the board. it's just the tolerance for homosexuality varies.

              and let's remove our broad societal pressures and our egotistical belief in our higher thought powers. what about other mammals? guess what? 1500 other species display homosexuality as well. maybe mallard ducks give in to peer pressure to be gay and live the gay way?
              AWD > RWD

              Comment


                Right back atchya. Top hits on google right under yours.

                http://www.trueorigin.org/gaygene01.asp

                http://blog.1069.com/is-being-gay-genetic.html


                This one says it doesn't exist but evidence leads them to think its genetic in men which leads me to believe hormonal imbalances and other factors that can be inherited. Etc...

                http://m.discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/born-gay


                At kershaw, faith isn't supposed to be proof. Faith is a personal belief. Just because you have faith in something doesn't mean its true or that everyone has to believe it.

                you say if it was societal that it wouldn't be found in some cultures? Can you elaborate because that would mean that everyone in a specific culture is exactly the same. Same situation, same surroundings, same everything otherwise the variables would be too different and that would be societal. And what about dudes in prison? Surely everyone that bangs dudes in prison for pleasure/dominance is gay when they go in. And the people interviewed in documentaries that are made to be the "woman" in men prisons that get dominated and when they're released later down the line are gay.

                Speaking of which, one thing annoys me. When people say no homo. You can't tell somebody you care about them without being gay or being seen as sensitive or weak. EFF MAINSTREAM!!
                Last edited by kwill22; 10-20-2012, 09:34 AM.
                DENY IGNORANCE!
                Schwarz 325-totaled
                brilliantrot 318i-daily

                Originally posted by mkcman17
                don't think your hamster wheels are fast now. you will still have to give up when trying to pass that V6 odyssey to make your offramp.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by kwill22 View Post
                  Right back atchya. Top hits on google right under yours.

                  scientific american, evolution, creation, creationism, origins, talk.origins, fossils, science





                  This one says it doesn't exist but evidence leads them to think its genetic in men which leads me to believe hormonal imbalances and other factors that can be inherited. Etc...




                  At kershaw, faith isn't supposed to be proof. Faith is a personal belief. Just because you have faith in something doesn't mean someone else does.
                  you are fucking kidding me right? "the true origin archive" 'exposing the myth of evolution'

                  what backwards "teach creationism in our science classes" inbred evangelical hole did you find that first article in? who wrote it? a preacher?

                  >>because i promise you it wasnt anyone with a degree in a biology or genetics<< this statement is totally wrong


                  note- im not cursing you or trying to be insulting, just a tad over the top
                  BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

                  Comment


                    Annnnnd this is where it goes around in circles.

                    Homosexuality is a perversion of the way the human body was meant to keep the line going. Having said that. We do need to respect people's personal choices if it's not hurting anyone else. If two consenting adults want to have this type of relationship they should be allowed to have it.
                    Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                    "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

                    ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by joshh View Post
                      Annnnnd this is where it goes around in circles.

                      Homosexuality is a perversion of the way the human body was meant to keep the line going. Having said that. We do need to respect people's personal choices if it's not hurting anyone else. If two consenting adults want to have this type of relationship they should be allowed to have it.
                      Scientology is a perversion of the mind and of rationality.

                      You're the biggest pervert of them all Joshh.

                      Comment


                        it's a perversion?

                        just like white skin, blue eyes, or blonde hair right? those are all genetic mutations as well. i wonder why it stuck around though... and why homosexuality is so wide spread among so many species?

                        must be because it's not detrimental to keeping a species going.
                        AWD > RWD

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Kershaw View Post
                          must be because it's not detrimental to keeping a species going.
                          It is a convenient form of voluntary population control by otherwise healthy individuals. It's too bad more people aren't gay. The world would be less populated and everyone would dress nicer and have clean houses.

                          Comment


                            my case and point against any and all creationist websites with "creationist doctors" claiming any kind of proof that being gay is a choice. (aside from my personal experiences which i promise you they are wrong as wrong can be)

                            "in the United States, 7 percent of eminent scientists believe in God, while 40 percent of less eminent scientists believe in God. In Britain, the survey indicated that just under 5 percent of eminent scientists believe in God. A lesser proportion would believe in creation; it is known that many of the general population who believe in God do not necessarily believe in a literalist version of the Creation story. In fact, Biblical-literalist creationism is considered a fringe belief."


                            The first thing is to decide what is meant be "recognized scientists" - eminent scientists, less eminent scientists who do perform pure research, or persons with advanced science degrees but perform little or no pure research. If reliable data on belief in creation within the scientific community is not available, we could start by establishing how many scientists believe in a personal god, because the number who literally believe in creation must be somewhat smaller than this.In 1998, a study by Larson and Witham appeared on the leading journal Nature ("Leading scientists still reject God"), showing that of the American scientists who had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences, only about 7 percent believe in a personal god. Religious believers form about40 percent of the less eminent scientists in America.A study in Britain, undertaken by R. Elisabeth Cornwell and Michael Stirrat, involved sending a questionnaire to all 1,074 Fellows of the Royal Society who possessed an email address, offering several propositions and asking the scientists to rank their beliefs on that point from 1 to 7. About 23 percent responded and preliminary results indicate that, of these, 3.3 percent agreed strongly (chose 7) and 78.8 percent disagreed strongly (chose 1) that a personal god exists. A total of 12 Fellows chose 6 or 7 to indicate that they were believers, while 213 Fellows chose 1 or 2 to indicate that they were nonbelievers.So, in the United States, an undefined majority of scientists do not believe in God. In Britain, 86 percent of eminent scientists do not believe in God. Since some respondents were apparently agnostic (in Britain chose 3,4 or 5) and some who believe in God probably do not believe in creation, the total proportion who do not believe in creation must be somewhat higher than 86 percent.


                            therefore 93% of eminent scientists in the united states disagree with true origin dot org therefore rendering any and all articles from the website questionable at BEST and more likely just plain false.
                            BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by LBJefferies View Post
                              It is a convenient form of voluntary population control by otherwise healthy individuals. It's too bad more people aren't gay. The world would be less populated and everyone would dress nicer and have clean houses.
                              damn skippy
                              BroWorks.com Bro is a lifestyle

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by LBJefferies View Post
                                It is a convenient form of voluntary population control by otherwise healthy individuals. It's too bad more people aren't gay. The world would be less populated and everyone would dress nicer and have clean houses.
                                Speaking of population control....you'd be correct there except with you're version of it. More people would have died from Aids if more people were gay....till they came out with HIV meds. That's right spanky, gays led that charge.
                                Your signature picture has been removed since it contained the Photobucket "upgrade your account" image.

                                "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the [federal] government." ~ James Madison

                                ‎"If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen" Barack Obama

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X