No one needs 15 rounds

[marshallnoise]

So you're just a terrorist-in-waiting? Paging the FBI...

To you, yes. To someone who understands the constitution and the very nature of liberty, a patriot.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[marshallnoise]

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

A gun with a severely restricted ammunition capacity, other than what was designed (like a revolver), renders the gun a blunt instrument and no longer a firearm built for its intended purpose. It is an infringement. All restrictions of how a gun operates is an infringement.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[z31maniac]

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

And since we have the most powerful and well-funded military in the world, by an order of magnitude, a well-regulated militia is hardly necessary for our security.

[CorvallisBMW]

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

So you're just a terrorist-in-waiting? Paging the FBI...

[CorvallisBMW]

I don't think it matters what your opinion is. What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?

Restricting ammunition capacity is just another way to make sure the bad guys and the government are the only ones with guns. Control. Period.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

And what part of "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state," do you not understand?

Does a restriction on hi-cap mags prevent you from owning a gun? No? Then it's not an infringement. Pretty fucking black-and-white.

[marshallnoise]

Like every coward, they're all talk and no action.

Calling people cowards already? Big talk from someone who would never put your neck out for anyone.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[BraveUlysses]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

Like every coward, they're all talk and no action.

[marshallnoise]

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

Guerilla warfare. It's all that is needed to keep the government in check.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[Vedubin01]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

Afghanistan's have been doing it against our military for 10+ years. Whos winning that?

[Roysneon]

You really want to go up against the military with its helicopters, tanks, RPG's, air to surface missiles, and nuclear fucking weapons with your full auto rifles?

Put the tin foil hat down, s'il vous plait.

[marshallnoise]

The only purpose that high-capacity magazines serve is to make offensive killing easier. Period. You can fire more rounds at more targets in a shorter period of time while showing yourself in a defenseless posture (i.e. reloading) less frequently. In other words, it makes killing lots of people in a short time period easier. It has nothing to do with defensive shooting and everything to do with offensive shooting.

I don't think it matters what your opinion is. What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?

Restricting ammunition capacity is just another way to make sure the bad guys and the government are the only ones with guns. Control. Period.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[CorvallisBMW]

The only purpose that high-capacity magazines serve is to make offensive killing easier. Period. You can fire more rounds at more targets in a shorter period of time while showing yourself in a defenseless posture (i.e. reloading) less frequently. In other words, it makes killing lots of people in a short time period easier. It has nothing to do with defensive shooting and everything to do with offensive shooting.

Mass shootings committed with high-capacity magazines between 1984 and 2013: 36

Recorded instances of guns with high-capacity magazines being used in self defense during the same period: 0

http://nyagv.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/VPCshootinglistSM.pdf

The idea that a mass-murder is in no way "inconvenienced" by the lack of a hi-cap mag, but that a private citizen is, would be laughable if it weren't directly responsible for the deaths of so many innocent people. I've heard so many people say "Hi-cap mags aren't the issue. It takes 2 seconds to reload. Banning them won't change anything". OK, so why do you need them if it's as easy to reload as you say it is? If it takes them 2 seconds to reload, it takes you 2 seconds also. A high-cap mag can't be a boon for you and a bust for them simultaneously. If it's easy for them to reload, it's easy for you too. If a hi-cap mag makes it easier for you to shoot a large number of assailants, it makes it easier for them to shoot a large number of victims. You don't get to cherry-pick the upsides and downsides and them apply them in whatever fashion furthers your own zealotry.

[marshallnoise]

Fair enough.

Game on.

I like reloading less often.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[einhander]

It is a meaningless venture. Who cares who said it? The words strung together still have meaning.

I was merely curious if your statement was true.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

Fair enough.

Game on.

[marshallnoise]

I'm not being flippant.

I challenged you to disprove me about Yamamato not saying what ParsedOut quoted.

You couldn't.

It is a meaningless venture. Who cares who said it? The words strung together still have meaning.

I was merely curious if your statement was true.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk