Trump Thread 2.0

[gwb72tii]

Sounds pretty much like obstruction of justice even though Trump's tweet is being downplayed by Rudy "Collusion is not a crime" Giuliani and Huckaby Sanders... The Don is feeling the sharks circling around him too close for comfort. Mueller had Cohen flip against Trump, and Manafort is most likely the next on the list... ;-)

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...r-probe-755030

"President Donald Trump called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to shut down special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation Wednesday, prompting a race by the president's legal team to try to contain the fallout."

prosecution of Manafort is not related to Russian collusion

collusion is in fact not a crime

[parkerbink]

so Lee, Parker and you all

where is your selective outrage at Hillary? her long career of breaking the law, uranium one, clinton foundation contributions, being an attorney and not understanding what top secret means etc?

your moral preening about Trump sounds a bit hollow

Trump invited Russians into the Oval Office and gave them top secret Israeli intelligence and told them he was relieved of the Russian investigation thanks to firing Comey.

Most importantly, Hillary is not President.

prosecution of Manafort is not related to Russian collusion

collusion is in fact not a crime

Thanks for proving you are a parrot.

First there was no collusion. Then Trump didn't know about the collusion his underlings did. Now it's not a crime.

Next it will be no conspiracy to collude.

What is your PayPal address gwb? I'll send you a dollar to buy a clue.

[cale]

prosecution of Manafort is not related to Russian collusion

collusion is in fact not a crime

GWB is our resident crotchety old man meme, never fails.

[mbonder]

so Lee, Parker and you all

where is your selective outrage at Hillary? her long career of breaking the law, uranium one, clinton foundation contributions, being an attorney and not understanding what top secret means etc?

your moral preening about Trump sounds a bit hollow

All this is just a deflection. At this point, Hillary isn't running the government, she isn't running much of anything at all, why can't you let dead dogs lie?

What's the point of attacking a has-been? The only justifiable reason is to try to sway the news cycle away from Trump, although I don't think you'll gain much traction as he just seems to do too many things that are newsworthy in all directions for anyone else to get a word in edgewise.

[z31maniac]

^I have already read multiple sources of speculation that she will run again in 2020.

[Todd Black 88]

The Dems would be retarded if they let her.

[parkerbink]

^I have already read multiple sources of speculation that she will run again in 2020.

I seriously doubt that but certainly hope not.

The Dems would be retarded if they let her.

They are retarded, that is not why she shouldn't run.

[mbonder]

^I have already read multiple sources of speculation that she will run again in 2020.

Dear God I hope not, if she does Trump will win by default.

[parkerbink]

No way she wins a primary again.

[z31maniac]

I hope so, but no one seemed to care about her taking the primary from Bernie.

Hopefully the DNC won't be so desperate for cash by then that the Clinton's can bankroll it.

[mbonder]

I don't know that Bernie would have fared any better against Trump given that Trump would have done nothing else besides call him a socialist/communist just like he spent the entire campaign against Hillary calling her crooked. Either one would play really well with Trump's base, you may have had more young people come out to vote, but I think it would have been offset by the number of older people that would have gone to Trump because of the fear of higher taxes and bankrolling what would have been perceived as free everything.

[z31maniac]

I don't know that Bernie would have fared any better against Trump given that Trump would have done nothing else besides call him a socialist/communist just like he spent the entire campaign against Hillary calling her crooked. Either one would play really well with Trump's base, you may have had more young people come out to vote, but I think it would have been offset by the number of older people that would have gone to Trump because of the fear of higher taxes and bankrolling what would have been perceived as free everything.

I'm not saying I think he would have won, I still wouldn't have voted for him over Johnson.

I'm saying don't be surprised if Hillary literally steals the nomination again.

[saucers]

collusion is in fact not a crime

[mbonder]

I'm not saying I think he would have won, I still wouldn't have voted for him over Johnson.

I'm saying don't be surprised if Hillary literally steals the nomination again.

I don't know that it's possible given the information that came out after the election about the Clinton Campaign giving money to the DNC, people are going to be looking for this type of activity.

I just hope she gives up already, I couldn't stand her before, can't stand her now, definitely don't want to have her in the future.

[z31maniac]

I don't know that it's possible given the information that came out after the election about the Clinton Campaign giving money to the DNC, people are going to be looking for this type of activity.

I just hope she gives up already, I couldn't stand her before, can't stand her now, definitely don't want to have her in the future.

I hope you're right.

After the results in NY a few months ago, even though she is showing herself to be completely inept, younger voters are tired of voting for multi-millionaire septu/octagenarians that are completely out of touch with the average middle class person.