Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

N52 oil pan design for Z4 engine arm based swap

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by Striker01 View Post
    Your dipstick drawing looks different than what I'm using and looking at mine again I think the dot is probably the full mark?! I was using the top cutout, so apparently I'm closer to the half mark at 5.5 quarts. Sorry if that's what's causing your grief, I'll update my other post with this picture.

    The top of the "aftermarket" indention is where mine was with 5.5 quarts. I plan to fill it until it reaches the top of the cutout, hopefully about 6 quarts, that should keep the oil just at or slightly below the top of the baffle.

    I wouldn't get hung up on the 5.5 number, the more oil the better. I think the full mark to parallel with the top of the baffle will be safe, I don't know how high is too much. Hoveringuy might have some better input.

    You could just make a new mark on the dipstick and send it, as is. Save quite a bit of work.
    Ahh that makes sense, thanks!

    And you are correct, I actually modeled out the M20 dipstick and not the M50. I need to update my model, thanks for pointing that out.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	m50 dipstick 1.jpg
Views:	294
Size:	202.4 KB
ID:	10126999

    I was able to rotate the dipstick while in the guide tube and mark a sharpie mark, which happens to be just a little bit above the little domed feature.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	m50 dipstick 2.jpg
Views:	269
Size:	233.3 KB
ID:	10127000

    Comment


      #92
      Removed the support cross members to bolt directly on to the block upside down.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	pan weld 1.jpg
Views:	265
Size:	240.5 KB
ID:	10127017

      Click image for larger version

Name:	pan weld 2.jpg
Views:	277
Size:	228.7 KB
ID:	10127015

      Click image for larger version

Name:	pan weld 3.jpg
Views:	292
Size:	252.8 KB
ID:	10127013

      Click image for larger version

Name:	pan weld 4.jpg
Views:	286
Size:	246.1 KB
ID:	10127014

      Click image for larger version

Name:	pan weld 5.jpg
Views:	263
Size:	232.3 KB
ID:	10127016

      Comment


        #93
        Max attachments per post is 5...

        Ignore the dusty inside :P

        Click image for larger version  Name:	pan weld 6.jpg Views:	3 Size:	231.0 KB ID:	10127019

        Baffle is also tacked together

        Click image for larger version  Name:	baffle weld 1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	221.9 KB ID:	10127022

        Looks like I have some slight interference in these areas at the moment.

        Click image for larger version  Name:	baffle weld 2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	228.9 KB ID:	10127021

        Click image for larger versionName:	baffle weld 3.jpgViews:	0Size:	165.2 KBID:	10127020


        Oh and I have access to a lathe now but it is not convenient to get to. I cut my oil pick up o-ring groove too shallow so it won't fit into the oil pump, oops.

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by Striker01 View Post

          Yes, Thanks for that idea! I shipped it off to projectJTv4​ today. He'll pass it on to the next guy who needs it when he's done.
          Bed plate is now in the possession of Yo.goob

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by projectJTv4 View Post

            Looks like I have some slight interference in these areas at the moment.

            Click image for larger version Name:	baffle weld 2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	228.9 KB ID:	10127021

            I bet the gasket will take care of that interference, don't forget to account for it for pickup depth.

            Glad to see you got the bedplate on to the next guy!

            Comment


              #96
              1) I just got some photos from a guy that received his SendCutSend pan package yesterday; he even has a spare block to bolt it to while he welds it. The wild part is, the N52 is going into an FR86!

              2) This is how much clearance my pan has. I just finished fabricating an undertray and it sits flush against the bottom of the pan. I did some CAD that worked-out really nice for attaching the front of it, hangs off the core support and bolts in where the stock oil cooler mount goes, it's strong A.F. and comes off with a few screws. Hit me up for the CAD if you're interested...

              Will the car be faster? quieter? overheating? Track season only a few months away...

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture2.jpg
Views:	157
Size:	168.9 KB
ID:	10133451 Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture3.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	182.9 KB
ID:	10133450 Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	191.4 KB
ID:	10133452 Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture4.jpg
Views:	155
Size:	37.1 KB
ID:	10133453

              Comment


                #97
                An FR86 would be a great landing spot for an N52! I'm glad to see this pan being used in other platforms!

                Originally posted by whysimon
                WTF is hello Kitty (I'm 28 with no kids and I don't have cable)

                Comment


                  #98
                  Perhaps a ridiculous question, but has anyone considered keeping the E90's Oil condition/level sensor?

                  my E30 had the 4 banger M42 with no oil level sensor like the M20, so im at a bit of a crossroads in terms of just doing a delete of the E90 oil sensor and using just a dipstick tube or figuring out a way of making the E90's sensor work with the SCS oil pan and fidgeting with that design problem?

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by Yo.goob View Post
                    Perhaps a ridiculous question, but has anyone considered keeping the E90's Oil condition/level sensor?

                    my E30 had the 4 banger M42 with no oil level sensor like the M20, so im at a bit of a crossroads in terms of just doing a delete of the E90 oil sensor and using just a dipstick tube or figuring out a way of making the E90's sensor work with the SCS oil pan and fidgeting with that design problem?
                    I'm not sure how valuable it would be without the E90 cluster. Probably better to put an M20 one in? No expert though. I have a dipstick.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Yo.goob View Post
                      Perhaps a ridiculous question, but has anyone considered keeping the E90's Oil condition/level sensor?

                      my E30 had the 4 banger M42 with no oil level sensor like the M20, so im at a bit of a crossroads in terms of just doing a delete of the E90 oil sensor and using just a dipstick tube or figuring out a way of making the E90's sensor work with the SCS oil pan and fidgeting with that design problem?
                      It's a lot of complication in the pan where there's not a lot of room for recessing that sensor. I added an M50 dipstick that's way more accurate than the electronic sensor and I change my oil every season anyway. The ONLY thing I miss is that it also reads oil temperature.

                      Comment


                        I added the M20 sensor only to have my check panel work. I confirmed it works with hoveringuy​'s pan today. Wasn't working at first, level float or whatever is inside wasn't sliding properly. Soaked/flushed with gas and degreaser, should've seen the crap came out from 30 years of use. Re-installed and works properly now. I have 3 flanges left, ordered enough to prevent paying the minimum order fee with SCS. They have some surface rust from but should cleanup fine. I will mail if anyone needs one, just weld it slow. I warped one on my first try. I also have the CAD file, if someone wants that. Not much of a contribution but took me forever to draw regardless, just need to select the option to have M6 studs pressed in when you order.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1536.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	177.2 KB
ID:	10133615

                        Comment


                          Panici The front bracket is the "magic". it bolts to the core support and provides the fingers that slide into the receiver on the tray, which is a stack of 0.100" aluminum (see post above). The rear has M6 pan head bolts that go into a plate that's bolted through the power steering rack bolts.

                          So, taking it on and off is barely an inconvenience, but at the same time it's strong A.F. If I ever do mangle it I won't be taking the core support out with it, I'll just order new pieces from SCS.

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	156.7 KB ID:	10133873 Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	169.6 KB ID:	10133874 Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture.jpg Views:	0 Size:	173.0 KB ID:	10133875 Click image for larger version  Name:	Capture2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	170.1 KB ID:	10133876
                          Last edited by hoveringuy; 01-22-2025, 06:57 PM.

                          Comment


                            I'm working on an aluminum version of the pan, just because... The fun part is that hopefully I can solve the oil pickup issue once and for all. Instead of "figure it out" it will be 3d printed and will have much better pickup placement.

                            I have the 3D printed aluminum prototype on-order and the delivered price for one was $100. It will mate with standard tubing.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture3.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	177.3 KB
ID:	10138330 Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	35.5 KB
ID:	10138331 Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture2.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	168.2 KB
ID:	10138332

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by hoveringuy View Post
                              I have the 3D printed aluminum prototype on-order and the delivered price for one was $100. It will mate with standard tubing.
                              I can't believe this didn't occur to me... great work!

                              Comment


                                It got kicked-back because my file had "too many sharp edges".... I guess that happens during conversion to STL, but the STEP file is fine so off to printing....

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	154.7 KB
ID:	10138358

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X