This is Photography

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VicSkimmr
    Mod Crazy
    • Apr 2010
    • 687

    #571
    Originally posted by 87e30
    Must be? Some people (Sdobbins ahh!!!) claim to have a secret that they won't reveal. Maybe some people put a pillow in the window or something and use it as a platform, I don't know. Hanging out the door and firing the shutter away is my only strategy...
    I actually don't think I've seen any of sdobbin's rollers, but I don't know what secret he could be holding out on.

    Here are the best tips I can give. I don't typically give this info out, so don't spread it around.

    Aperture set to about f/8

    Focus set to AI Servo (for Canons). It's the focus that automatically refocuses for every shot.

    Burst mode burst mode burst mode

    I usually use about 1/35 for shutter speed, but the faster it is the less chance of camera shake you'll have

    I brace myself with my legs and cradle the camera with both hands. I use my right hand thumb to hit the shutter release button. Obviously we never go very fast, 45mph is the max I ever shoot at. Otherwise I might lose a knuckle on a bump. For obvious reasons, SUVs make poor cars to shoot from.

    Make sure you have stuff near your car that you're driving by, that's what will give the speed effect. The wheels and road will imply movement, but without trees or something close by the background will be frozen.

    Lighting is key (isn't it always?) I get my best results from strong, indirect light and I only shoot rollers during the golden hour (or just before).

    Too much light will make the photo look harsh, not enough will make everything too soft. It's a fine balance and it's truly a crap shoot with rolling shots. The hard part isn't getting a little bit of the car in focus, it's getting the entire car in focus.

    Here's some examples for comparison. Look over the entire car to see what I mean.

    Good lighting (light source is approximately to the left of the house)


    Poor lighting (direct light, light source is beside the car on the drivers side)


    Poor lighting (not enough light, right side of car is soft)
    Jason
    flickr

    Comment

    • izthistaken
      Grease Monkey
      • Jun 2010
      • 387

      #572
      Originally posted by VicSkimmr
      No rigs. I'm using a 10-22 so no IS either. I guess it's just from practice?
      Just got mine haven't done a roller w/ it yet. Can't wait.
      Originally posted by Pussy30
      You guy understand when you shoot with a rig you can seriously push the car and make it look like 70mph, speed is irrelevant once you can drag the shutter and not worry about vibration
      The price of a rig compared to a normal rolling shot.. Rigs are cool, but VERY pricey. I'm not against either. Getting my rig soon..

      Need friends w/ lower cars.. lol


      Dodge Ram by izthistaken, on Flickr


      rolling Jeep by izthistaken, on Flickr


      srt8 rolling by izthistaken, on Flickr


      Dave's RX8 rolling by izthistaken, on Flickr


      Soap's Terminator rolling by izthistaken, on Flickr


      2011 5.0 belle isle bridge by izthistaken, on Flickr
      -Matt

      http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

      1990 325i
      1999 FRC



      Flickr

      Comment

      • VicSkimmr
        Mod Crazy
        • Apr 2010
        • 687

        #573
        Originally posted by izthistaken
        Just got mine haven't done a roller w/ it yet. Can't wait.
        You just got a 10-22? They're great lenses, but they're more difficult for rolling shots than you might at first think. I generally shoot my rollers at around 17mm.
        Jason
        flickr

        Comment

        • izthistaken
          Grease Monkey
          • Jun 2010
          • 387

          #574
          Yup, just got it 2 weeks ago. I noticed that 10 is probably too wide to do rollers. I tried to do a roller of a semi truck, my g/f was going too fast though. lol Going to try it soon. Was going to do it the way you do before I read that. lol
          -Matt

          http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

          1990 325i
          1999 FRC



          Flickr

          Comment

          • 87e30
            R3V Elite
            • Jul 2008
            • 5676

            #575
            Hey Jason, thanks for sharing your secrets.

            I shoot something similar, usually with a faster SS but then it doesn't turn out as well. I think your focus on light is key and it's something I'd never considered for the focus of the entire car. I will DEFINITELY keep this in mind more often. not enough light really can soften things up:

            This image way way too dark out.


            This one was boring and overcast:


            And this one had a nice sunshine diffused through trees:



            Before your mention of light I'd never put all of this together... but the last is definitely the best in my opinion.


            I also agree, I shoot rollers from 15-24 most usually. (crop sensor)

            Cool shots posted above.
            Originally posted by z31maniac
            I just hate everyone.

            No need for discretion.

            Comment

            • izthistaken
              Grease Monkey
              • Jun 2010
              • 387

              #576
              ^ Nice shots. I like the Ruckus one a lot. Here's a bike I shot, wish I had a wider lens.


              Yamaha R6 rolling by izthistaken, on Flickr
              -Matt

              http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

              1990 325i
              1999 FRC



              Flickr

              Comment

              • izthistaken
                Grease Monkey
                • Jun 2010
                • 387

                #577
                BTW, any of you guys who aren't on www.photography-on-the.net/forum you NEED to be. I've learned most everything I know from there. Same user name as on here if you care.
                -Matt

                http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

                1990 325i
                1999 FRC



                Flickr

                Comment

                • VicSkimmr
                  Mod Crazy
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 687

                  #578
                  Yep exactly.

                  I think understanding light is by far the most complex part of photography, and it's especially difficult with cars because they're shiny and reflect it. And that makes it even more difficult for rolling shots because the light is constantly changing. A lot of people will probably find this offensive, but I feel like using artificial light is a lot like cheating and is never as good as natural light (for cars only).

                  For a lot of colors I've found it's more important to make sure that the scene the car is reflecting is properly lit than the car itself. If you keep a keen eye out for car pics that you like, I think you'll notice that the cars themselves never (ok, almost never) receive direct sunlight.
                  Jason
                  flickr

                  Comment

                  • 87e30
                    R3V Elite
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 5676

                    #579
                    Is that the canon site?

                    At any rate I've picked up a lot of photo knowledge from tons of different places, but it comes down to practice... which is the step I'm missing. For example I haven't shot a rolling shot since probably september.

                    Also I learned a lot when upgrading to an (old) nicer body that forced me to think more.
                    Originally posted by z31maniac
                    I just hate everyone.

                    No need for discretion.

                    Comment

                    • 87e30
                      R3V Elite
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 5676

                      #580
                      Originally posted by VicSkimmr
                      Yep exactly.

                      I think understanding light is by far the most complex part of photography, and it's especially difficult with cars because they're shiny and reflect it. And that makes it even more difficult for rolling shots because the light is constantly changing. A lot of people will probably find this offensive, but I feel like using artificial light is a lot like cheating and is never as good as natural light (for cars only).

                      For a lot of colors I've found it's more important to make sure that the scene the car is reflecting is properly lit than the car itself. If you keep a keen eye out for car pics that you like, I think you'll notice that the cars themselves never (ok, almost never) receive direct sunlight.
                      Light is definitely tricky. Recognizing it quickly and putting together the colors in your head is a huge challenge and is where tallent comes through... and where I either fail or just get plain lucky.

                      Some of my favorite photos are sun+strobe lit. But I get what you're saying. I completely agree on artifical light, I think it opens up a crazy amount of opportunity. All (okay almost all) commercial work is going to be done with artificial light.
                      Originally posted by z31maniac
                      I just hate everyone.

                      No need for discretion.

                      Comment

                      • Pussy30
                        Banned
                        • Feb 2011
                        • 463

                        #581
                        Originally posted by VicSkimmr
                        Yep exactly.

                        I think understanding light is by far the most complex part of photography
                        Understanding light IS photography.

                        Comment

                        • izthistaken
                          Grease Monkey
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 387

                          #582
                          Originally posted by VicSkimmr
                          Yep exactly.

                          I think understanding light is by far the most complex part of photography, and it's especially difficult with cars because they're shiny and reflect it. And that makes it even more difficult for rolling shots because the light is constantly changing. A lot of people will probably find this offensive, but I feel like using artificial light is a lot like cheating and is never as good as natural light (for cars only).

                          For a lot of colors I've found it's more important to make sure that the scene the car is reflecting is properly lit than the car itself. If you keep a keen eye out for car pics that you like, I think you'll notice that the cars themselves never (ok, almost never) receive direct sunlight.
                          I'm not starting a war, just wondering if you've shot cars w/ artificial light? It's a pain in the ass. I think strobes can really bring out a car if done right. Not that I have any idea how to do that yet. I'm still learning. lol

                          Yes, it's the Canon site, but accept anyone.

                          Agree w/ all other comments.
                          -Matt

                          http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

                          1990 325i
                          1999 FRC



                          Flickr

                          Comment

                          • VicSkimmr
                            Mod Crazy
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 687

                            #583
                            Photography is the art of painting light, but a lot of people who call themselves photographers don't really understand it or how to utilize it best.


                            Yeah most commercial stuff is definitely shot with artificial light, but I just can't seem to like it usually. I guess it's just a personal preference.
                            Jason
                            flickr

                            Comment

                            • izthistaken
                              Grease Monkey
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 387

                              #584
                              Yup, once the Nikon/Canon wars start I always say that they are all lightboxes, they are just boxes that capture light.
                              -Matt

                              http://www.facebook.com/MatthewTrombleyPhotography

                              1990 325i
                              1999 FRC



                              Flickr

                              Comment

                              • 87e30
                                R3V Elite
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 5676

                                #585
                                Originally posted by VicSkimmr
                                Photography is the art of painting light, but a lot of people who call themselves photographers don't really understand it or how to utilize it best.


                                Yeah most commercial stuff is definitely shot with artificial light, but I just can't seem to like it usually. I guess it's just a personal preference.
                                I used to feel that way but I've become incredibly impressed with their ability to design on the computer. It's an entirely new aspect. jeff ludes portfolio and scott dukes portfolio online if you're interested...
                                Originally posted by z31maniac
                                I just hate everyone.

                                No need for discretion.

                                Comment

                                Working...