Navy Yard Shooting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Exodus_2pt0
    replied
    Umm... Isn't this thread about the Navy Yard Shooting?

    No one commit suicide there.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2761377
    replied
    the usage of gun-suicide rates to justify an anti-2a agenda is a manifestation of statist thought- "We know better than you how to live your life. You are not allowed to end it."

    so what if guns are an effective way to check out? isn't that each persons choice? I say mind your own business and assuage your survivors' guilt another way. don't blame the tool.

    Merritt Edson, CMH holder and victor of Bloody Ridge checked out by running his car in his closed garage. another reason to ban cars.

    and yes, i do have personal knowledge/connection with more than one suicide.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsleeve
    So again I still dont see how owning guns makes you more prone to killing your self.
    Then perhaps you should be more focused on addressing why you're unable to grasp a relatively simple conclusion to a study which focused on the statistics of gun related suicide, rather than arguing something you self admittedly "still don't see". The study was not skewed, it was an accurate representation of the stats, you simply disagree with it's findings. Fortunately, truthfulness and accuracy is not measured in units of sleeve logic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vedubin01
    replied
    Originally posted by z31maniac
    Ahh, so you're in favor of thought police that take away rights without having committed a crime?

    Not at all, I have a pretty large safe that only I know the combination to, that keeps my guns free from anyone other than who I want to see or touch. If I ever had a son or daughter that had a mental illness I would even try to safe proof that if I chose to own firearms.

    We have had this discussion before...


    Now I don't mean to make light of a tragic situation. I know its a tragic moment in more than just his life, and affects those that are close. I understand and respect that.
    But it was not the guns fault it was used in the shooting. Its not like he woke up on day and said yesterday my life was awesome and today Kurt Cobain it. Writing was all over the place before that ever happened.
    Last edited by Vedubin01; 09-30-2013, 03:23 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    clearly you've skipped over the part where suicides by gun were far higher in homes where a gun was available than where it was not, and that more suicides used guns than any other method.

    it's staring you right in the face, but you don't want to believe it.
    I think you mean successful attempts. Duhhh its hard to kill your self with a firearm if you dont own one. Also a firearm is an effective and reliable means of doing so. If you try to kill your self will pills and fail that does not count as a suicide now does it...... People fail at suicide at a much higher rate with other methods than those that use a firearm.


    So again I still dont see how owning guns makes you more prone to killing your self. This is just a convenient way to package the stats to push the agenda....

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by cale
    Because legal ownership by stable individuals of useful weapons such as shotguns and rifles are not an issue. Freak accidents are going to happen yes, but what do you propose should be done about it? I was merely playing devils advocate by posting the link I did, I don't think suicides should be a reason to restrict those of a stable mental state from owning.
    I think that is the point - aside from suicides, there's nothing to stop some crazy person from buying a bunch of guns and shooting up a school. the NRA camp is against ANY changes that would try and stop that from happening.

    there's almost zero spending in this country for people with mental illnesses as well - they'd probably be classified as part of the 47% that everyone on the right looks down on.

    Leave a comment:


  • nando
    replied
    Originally posted by Vedubin01
    I find it almost funny that people would like to blame guns for an attempted suicide rather than putting the blame on the family. The family knew this person was not stable yet allowed them to own a firearm?

    More like the fingers should be placed on the family and not the gun!
    clearly you've skipped over the part where suicides by gun were far higher in homes where a gun was available than where it was not, and that more suicides used guns than any other method.

    it's staring you right in the face, but you don't want to believe it.

    Leave a comment:


  • z31maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by Vedubin01
    I find it almost funny that people would like to blame guns for an attempted suicide rather than putting the blame on the family. The family knew this person was not stable yet allowed them to own a firearm?

    More like the fingers should be placed on the family and not the gun!
    Ahh, so you're in favor of thought police that take away rights without having committed a crime?

    Leave a comment:


  • Vedubin01
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    It was most likely his own gun.

    I find it almost funny that people would like to blame guns for an attempted suicide rather than putting the blame on the family. The family knew this person was not stable yet allowed them to own a firearm?

    More like the fingers should be placed on the family and not the gun!

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by BraveUlysses
    Why would that circumstance change anything? It was most likely his own gun.
    Because legal ownership by stable individuals of useful weapons such as shotguns and rifles are not an issue. Freak accidents are going to happen yes, but what do you propose should be done about it? I was merely playing devils advocate by posting the link I did, I don't think suicides should be a reason to restrict those of a stable mental state from owning.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsleeve
    replied
    I still fail to see how one of my firearms is going to convince me to shoot my self with it. That's like saying my fork made me eat that whole apple pie in one sitting.

    If I was to kill myself it would be with an od, I would not want to leave shuch a mess ad traumatic scene for my loved ones to have to deal with

    Leave a comment:


  • BraveUlysses
    replied
    Originally posted by cale
    How was he able to get his hands on the shotgun? If it was owned by someone who is otherwise a responsible gun owner, I'm sorry to say that that's just an unfortunate incident.
    Why would that circumstance change anything? It was most likely his own gun.

    Leave a comment:


  • cale
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    no, I don't think so. maybe he would have tried again later, but if he didn't have a gun laying around it wouldn't have been so easy to do. and even if he had, the results couldn't have possibly been worse.

    he didn't die. that's the really fucked up part - but he may have been better off if he had. he lost his sinuses, his eye, part of his jaw, his teeth - he still has BB's in his brain, which cause him seizures. he can't taste or smell. he has a patch of skin taken from his ass where his eye used to be. he looks like a monster from some awful zombie movie. you think he was depressed before?

    again, the answer to people dying is to do nothing? I'm not saying we need the NSA to scan your iris and implant a 666 chip into your forehead for tracking, but we should do nothing? because 10,000-30,000 dead people is OK? monthly/weekly mass shootings is OK? crazy people walking into a church and blowing away the priest is OK? as long as it doesn't happen to you, right?
    How was he able to get his hands on the shotgun? If it was owned by someone who is otherwise a responsible gun owner, I'm sorry to say that that's just an unfortunate incident.

    Leave a comment:


  • FlexdXJ
    replied
    Originally posted by nando
    no, I don't think so. maybe he would have tried again later, but if he didn't have a gun laying around it wouldn't have been so easy to do. and even if he had, the results couldn't have possibly been worse.

    he didn't die. that's the really fucked up part - but he may have been better off if he had. he lost his sinuses, his eye, part of his jaw, his teeth - he still has BB's in his brain, which cause him seizures. he can't taste or smell. he has a patch of skin taken from his ass where his eye used to be. he looks like a monster from some awful zombie movie. you think he was depressed before?

    again, the answer to people dying is to do nothing? I'm not saying we need the NSA to scan your iris and implant a 666 chip into your forehead for tracking, but we should do nothing? because 10,000-30,000 dead people is OK? monthly/weekly mass shootings is OK? crazy people walking into a church and blowing away the priest is OK? as long as it doesn't happen to you, right?

    Yes, we should do something...Hence the mental health issue of that statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thizzelle
    replied
    wait...........criminals follow the law

    Leave a comment:

Working...