This is Photography

[Wschnitz]

those are some decent rollers. I really want to take some rolling shots but its hard to drive and shoot.

I need a copilot.

[D.Martijn]

I should have posted this here instead of the "this is pictures" thread. So here it is;

Last weekend we went from Belgium all the way to Stratford-upon-Avon in the UK to attend a yearly VW Golf mk1 meeting. My uncles went with his 1.6 GTI and my brother and I with our 1.1
Even with more than twice the power of our 1.1, my uncle had some times trouble keeping up with us on the windy B-roads. He said he might have more power but I have more guts. lol

When we were headed home I took a couple of rolling shots out of the windows of both Golfs. Turned out okay.

[Wschnitz]

If any of yall shoot canon still and want a 50mm F1.4 Im letting it go for pretty cheap.

[Wschnitz]

The one with the ATC is dope.

[BlackbirdM3]

Last nights excitement





Will

[BlackbirdM3]

So, this is what happens when the B1 is supposed to take off an hour after you get to the runway, but instead is releasing the brakes while you are running, and still 50 yards from where you want to be.




I gotta say, even though the pics suck, but holy hell it was badass to see in person.

Will

[BlackbirdM3]

From Oshkosh yesterday.

Monday morning.




back to work. Soo much to shoot, so little time.

Will

[BlackbirdM3]

yeah I tend to like the smooth blur of moving water.... 8-10 sec exposure is normally enough, and yeah if its a shity one and you have to fix it after, I would just stop the aperture down as much as I could and just live with it and the CPL....

one of my favs at 8 sec and f13 with a CPL and 10stop ND

IMG_2822 by mrsleeve, on Flickr

Forgot my ND so I had to stop way down on this one but this is 10 sec, much longer and the water would have been totally blown out
IMG_0954 by mrsleeve, on Flickr

Wow, those are awesome shots.

Will

[Reichart12]

Hmm interesting perspective. I normally seem to keep it below 3seconds. Possibly because of light limits with just a CPL, but it would be cool to see how some of the waterfalls Im around often look at 10seconds. I guess a bit of detail left is my normal.


And my Snoqualmie photo was 9 shots stitched together in post. Way too crowded to want to set up a tripod for that.

[mrsleeve]

You guys think those could have benefited with a longer exposure? I have a 10 stop but its cheap and cast a purple glow so I don't use it much even if its easily fixed in LR.

yeah I tend to like the smooth blur of moving water.... 8-10 sec exposure is normally enough, and yeah if its a shity one and you have to fix it after, I would just stop the aperture down as much as I could and just live with it and the CPL....

one of my favs at 8 sec and f13 with a CPL and 10stop ND

IMG_2822 by mrsleeve, on Flickr

Forgot my ND so I had to stop way down on this one but this is 10 sec, much longer and the water would have been totally blown out
IMG_0954 by mrsleeve, on Flickr

[Wschnitz]

You definitely dont need to conform to a look or anything. Im just a fan of long exposures.

Next Paycheck Im gonna buy a 24-70 and the 10 stop ND so I can do some again.

[coldweatherblue]

I thought your photos were well exposed.

I'd be curious to see the Snoqualmie Falls pic stopped down with a longer exposure but at the same time your pic shows well the detail of the falls.

[Wschnitz]

You guys think those could have benefited with a longer exposure? I have a 10 stop but its cheap and cast a purple glow so I don't use it much even if its easily fixed in LR.

For water I notice really good looking long exposures around 30-60s with F4-F8 aperture so that not everything is extra sharp.

[Reichart12]

You guys think those could have benefited with a longer exposure? I have a 10 stop but its cheap and cast a purple glow so I don't use it much even if its easily fixed in LR.

[Wschnitz]

I just think 2-6 stops are more versatile cause you can use them for video stuff too.